Author Topic: 1911 China coin to see is to believe (Read 106515 times)

linlaujiou · « **on:** November 10, 2016, 04:41:44 AM »

境外論壇首發
敬告機制幣同好.撿漏當撿如此漏

coffeyce · « **Reply #1 on:** November 17, 2016, 11:24:31 PM »

looks nice

poconopenn · « **Reply #2 on:** November 18, 2016, 12:57:39 AM »

Quote from: coffeyce on November 17, 2016, 11:24:31 PM

looks nice

Yes, looks nice, but may not be genuine, based on the surface wear pattern.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #3 on:** November 18, 2016, 01:53:20 AM »

Quote from: poconopenn on November 18, 2016, 12:57:39 AM

Yes, looks nice, but may not be genuine, based on the surface wear pattern.

To be sure . It is a very rare and old coin.
If you can find the same one .
I congratulate you on you are a lucky dog.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #4 on:** November 18, 2016, 04:41:20 AM »

poconopenn · « **Reply #5 on:** November 19, 2016, 05:38:21 PM »

For circulated coin in VF/+ condition, the edge of Chinese character in the marked area ought to be flat and smooth, not as shown in the picture. There are other areas similar to the marked area in this coin, in addition to the pimpled rim.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #6 on:** November 19, 2016, 08:23:21 PM »

thank you

enlarge 60X

poconopenn · « **Reply #7 on:** November 19, 2016, 10:15:55 PM »

Please enlarge the attached picture.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #8 on:** November 20, 2016, 07:40:08 AM »

SANDAC · « **Reply #9 on:** November 20, 2016, 09:40:41 PM »

My Y-31 has been cleaned, so whatever ridges that may have been there are gone.

dragondollar · « **Reply #10 on:** November 30, 2016, 08:16:02 AM »

Not rare, not old, not genuine.

No need to pore over the surfaces, there is many problems even with the denticles and the legends. The toning is also rather low quality.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #11 on:** November 30, 2016, 05:41:20 PM »

Quote from: dragondollar on November 30, 2016, 08:16:02 AM

Not rare, not old, not genuine.

No need to pore over the surfaces, there is many problems even with the denticles and the legends. The toning is also rather low quality.
[/quote

假幣以假仿假.以致徒孫眾多.儼然已成正宗
既不稀罕..何妨找出幾枚您認為與此幣相同特徵的錢幣..貼上來瞧瞧

linlaujiou · « **Reply #12 on:** November 30, 2016, 07:41:57 PM »

不要以為眼下常看到的就是真
林杯的老錢幣會告訴你真相

SANDAC · « **Reply #13 on:** December 01, 2016, 09:30:22 AM »

My only Y-322 was slabbed by PCGS as genuine, but not gradable.

dobedo · « **Reply #14 on:** December 01, 2016, 10:45:17 AM »

"不要以為眼下常看到的就是真" =>
不要以為眼下不常看到的就是不真 :)

linlaujiou · « **Reply #15 on:** December 01, 2016, 07:16:01 PM »

敬告錢幣鑑定公司..別老是以拍賣成交幣當作鑑定標準幣.
要有真本事以機制特徵作認定..哉冇?

linlaujiou · « **Reply #16 on:** December 21, 2016, 03:20:29 AM »

路邊野花不要採.入盒烏龍不要買

linlaujiou · « **Reply #17 on:** January 13, 2017, 07:33:14 PM »

曾經滄海難為水.除卻巫山不是雲

linlaujiou · « **Reply #18 on:** January 16, 2017, 11:22:00 PM »

刻刀痕是機制特徵的直接證據

林杯說........撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #19 on:** January 18, 2017, 06:47:40 PM »

容我空間.給你真相.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #20 on:** January 19, 2017, 06:20:44 PM »

湖北省造光緒元寶背本省版屬湖北銀元局初鑄.
與之後湖北省造光緒元寶標準版圖文皆有差異.
兩者並非只有本省兩字有無的差異而已.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #21 on:** February 03, 2017, 08:02:16 PM »

文字筆劃..大致相同大不同

正確傳承才是收藏真諦

linlaujiou · « **Reply #22 on:** February 06, 2017, 07:44:02 PM »

不同版別34年北洋造七錢二分在龍爪不易磨損處設有通用暗記
林杯說...撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #23 on:** February 09, 2017, 08:27:12 PM »

1928中華民國十七年張作霖文裝大元帥紀念幣....年字暗記
60倍放大成像...經當面溝通.錢幣鑑定公司承認僅用8-10倍放大鏡觀察

曾送ACCA評鑑..該單位負責人竟稱是以樣幣非傳承有序的經驗法則判假...林杯敢說...鑑定個鳥..

linlaujiou · « **Reply #24 on:** February 10, 2017, 07:40:56 AM »

欣賞刻刀痕.暗記判斷

林杯說....撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #25 on:** February 12, 2017, 06:37:56 PM »

34年北洋造中英文字母都在筆劃兩端搞花樣防偽
相同英文字母也刻意不同
中文字筆觸亦極力脫離楷書字體的規範
土金版錢字金第2橫刻畫像香爐

linlaujiou · « **Reply #26 on:** February 14, 2017, 07:42:39 PM »

此枚1928大元帥紀念幣林杯整整花了8個月時間才破解全幣防偽巧思及暗記佈局.突破口在國字.
俺說.有實力鑑定此幣種的錢幣鑑定公司尚未出生.

撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #27 on:** February 17, 2017, 07:38:38 PM »

1927中華民國國民政府十六年造孫中山陵墓幣

撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #28 on:** March 03, 2017, 10:10:15 PM »

七錢二分主幣.

撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #29 on:** March 10, 2017, 08:24:29 PM »

黎元洪開國紀念幣無冠開領版.據說查無此幣圖樣.

天下無難事..只怕有心人.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #30 on:** March 12, 2017, 10:20:56 AM »

幣面缺料髒污.撥雲見日後真相如附圖

上6圖為髒污原況.燈源放大反光.反不利於立體層次觀察.抱歉

高解析欣賞人像刻刀痕刻模技巧.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #31 on:** March 12, 2017, 07:18:42 PM »

1896年四川楷书(缶宝)光绪元宝库平七钱二分银币,又称“四川楷书”
乃最初之试制样币。另一种光绪元宝的宝字作简写“尒”,俗称“尒宝”,为后来之产行用品,有多种版式。
正反面均带湖北式样的花星,用楷书篆刻七钱二分字样,造型精美,存世量极少。
09年四川省造光绪元宝七钱二分的缶宝长六花星的市场估价为十万元。

圖片庫均查無此幣種樣幣圖樣.林杯首發貢獻兩版樣幣龍圖.

撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #32 on:** March 13, 2017, 09:10:29 PM »

1928中華民國十七年張作霖文裝大元帥紀念幣
天津造幣總廠末代人像幣的典範
看看雕模技師的功力如何?
曾送台北ACCA鑑定..被以非傳承有序的經驗法則……判假.

林杯說…..撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #33 on:** March 17, 2017, 09:14:26 PM »

廣東省造壽字雙龍七錢二
壽字左下有邊緣明確的蝕刻暗記.暗記左側龍麟有蝕刻對照暗記.
暗記右邊上有一顆星.
在燈下肉眼即可見星光閃爍.是否意喻...海角天涯一壽星.

寶字王右下腳是否暗示此王被扯後腿?

人工刻刀痕明確..還原造幣鋼模初始樣態

撿漏當撿如此漏.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #34 on:** April 10, 2017, 04:27:18 AM »

1928......AUTO DOLLAR

注意筆劃上及車身細條紋狀刻刀痕.車燈泡位置大小.七字頭形態.圖文細節

撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #35 on:** April 10, 2017, 07:26:52 PM »

研究錢幣是為正確傳承盡一份心力
林杯說..凡機制真幣必定設有防偽暗記.平淡無奇的文字.圖樣.絕對真不了….高手看字就能識真假.
流通幣需多組幣模因應造幣數量需求.相同幣種不同模組即為不同版.不同版幣模會設有共同暗記.這需要多找幾枚真幣仔細比對才會發現..造假者唯恐淪為同模傷.會將暗記全數抹平.製造出完美無缺的假象.投其所好.
眼力就是在持續不斷的比對中練就的.不下苦工夫.就沒有機會品嘗先知先覺者的寂寞.

poconopenn · « **Reply #36 on:** April 10, 2017, 10:05:57 PM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on April 10, 2017, 07:26:52 PM

研究錢幣是為正確傳承盡一份心力
林杯說..凡機制真幣必定設有防偽暗記.平淡無奇的文字.圖樣.絕對真不了….高手看字就能識真假.
流通幣需多組幣模因應造幣數量需求.相同幣種不同模組即為不同版.不同版幣模會設有共同暗記.這需要多找幾枚真幣仔細比對才會發現..造假者唯恐淪為同模傷.會將暗記全數抹平.製造出完美無缺的假象.投其所好.
眼力就是在持續不斷的比對中練就的.不下苦工夫.就沒有機會品嘗先知先覺者的寂寞.

The PCGS certified coins posted by you are fake coins in fake PCGS holders. Just want to make sure that members of CCF understand that these two coins are not certified by PCGS.

poconopenn · « **Reply #37 on:** April 11, 2017, 02:30:48 PM »

IMO, 4 coins (A, B, C and D) posted by you may not be genuine. The identical scratches, as outlined in the pictures are not hidden marks as you suggested. They are too deep to be considered as Mint marks. Those coins are reproduction from the die copied from a circulated genuine coin.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #38 on:** April 11, 2017, 07:38:37 PM »

Quote from: poconopenn on April 11, 2017, 02:30:48 PM

IMO, 4 coins (A, B, C and D) posted by you may not be genuine. The identical scratches, as outlined in the pictures are not hidden marks as you suggested. They are too deep to be considered as Mint marks. Those coins are reproduction from the die copied from a circulated genuine coin.

您好..4圖紅圈標示處為人工刻刀痕.幣模以雕刻鑿陰刻.幣面呈現的是不規則細條紋狀的鋪陳.堆砌.糾結.把圖放大.底板也能發現不規則細條紋狀陽刻.刻刀痕就是機制特徵的直接證據.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #39 on:** April 11, 2017, 08:01:17 PM »

poconopenn · « **Reply #40 on:** April 11, 2017, 10:30:15 PM »

I understand that 刻刀痕就是機制特徵的直接證據. However, it can be reproduced by counterfeiter. When four different coins have identical “deep” scratched lines as shown in the pictures, IMO, those coins are highly questionable and most likely are not genuine.

There are identical pimple in these four coins too.

poconopenn · « **Reply #41 on:** April 11, 2017, 11:13:09 PM »

Here are pictures of NGC MS64 1903 Fengtein silver dragon dollar. The third picture is PCGS XF coin.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #42 on:** April 12, 2017, 02:12:14 AM »

Quote from: poconopenn on April 11, 2017, 11:13:09 PM

Here are pictures of NGC MS64 1903 Fengtein silver dragon dollar. The third picture is PCGS XF coin.

您好...在把您的貼圖放大後
1.   NGC第一圖文字筆劃邊緣是用黑色顏料描邊做舊.癸字第二橫右端分叉是敗筆.珠圈大小形態一致是電腦排版製作.文字筆劃毫無立體層次可言
2.   NGC第二圖龍圖外圈英文字母上環圈為一眼假的假模裂.
3.   PCGS第3圖文字筆劃上及底板上遍佈砂眼.黑色顏料色澤一致.係人為刻意做舊.庫字下橫端左側堆銀.下直端左側框邊..寶字貝內多一橫..此特徵.應屬鑄造孤品.

poconopenn · « **Reply #43 on:** April 12, 2017, 12:47:01 PM »

My point in two previous postings is trying to show the problematic areas of those four coins which IMO, they are not genuine, and are reproduction from a die copied from a genuine circulated coin.

Here are additional two areas which I was not mentioned previously in this small section of the coin. Usually, I will not give away so many information, since counterfeiters also visit this forum to gain the knowledge and therefore to improve their skill in making fake coin.

The shape and size of those dots in the marked area are identical for these four coins. They were connected at the same spot. This can not be happened, when the coins were wore in different degree.

刻刀痕 (knife notch/knife mark) can be copied from circulated coin by skillful counterfeiters and can not be considered as the only evidence of a genuine coin.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #44 on:** April 12, 2017, 07:25:58 PM »

您好..在您標示的4圖當中..各部分細節是大致相同大不同.就是說紅線標示的區塊刻痕各不相同.只是有不同程度的磨損.
流通幣需多組模就是讓同一個人雕刻同一幣種幣模也不會完全相同.您認為這4枚是同模假幣...我卻認為這4枚並非同模..真正同模幣各部位細節將完全相同.
底下放兩枚同模傷假幣供參..NGC假幣入盒前三圖這枚為美國華人所有..末2圖為中國大陸泉友民风所有...請您見識同模假幣的仿製功力

linlaujiou · « **Reply #45 on:** April 12, 2017, 07:33:54 PM »

見識真幣刻刀痕...您說...好仿不好仿?

poconopenn · « **Reply #46 on:** April 12, 2017, 11:48:59 PM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on April 12, 2017, 07:25:58 PM

您好..在您標示的4圖當中..各部分細節是大致相同大不同.就是說紅線標示的區塊刻痕各不相同.只是有不同程度的磨損.
流通幣需多組模就是讓同一個人雕刻同一幣種幣模也不會完全相同.您認為這4枚是同模假幣...我卻認為這4枚並非同模..真正同模幣各部位細節將完全相同.
底下放兩枚同模傷假幣供參..NGC假幣入盒前三圖這枚為美國華人所有..末2圖為中國大陸泉友民风所有...請您見識同模假幣的仿製功力

Yes, these two NGC certified coins are counterfeit and NGC had made mistake. I am surprised that counterfeiter can make such high quality fake, but stupid enough to make antique surface in the same area.

However, these two fake coins were not polished as bad as 4 coins mentioned before. I do not have time to show you additional identical pimples for those four coins tonight and will try to do it in the next two days.

poconopenn · « **Reply #47 on:** April 13, 2017, 12:02:59 AM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on April 12, 2017, 07:33:54 PM

見識真幣刻刀痕...您說...好仿不好仿?

Yes, it can be copied with current technology.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #48 on:** April 13, 2017, 07:38:37 PM »

您好..機制造幣是絕對的秉持一個幣模一個樣.像蓋章一樣..任何細節的相對位置絕對一樣.就是說連此人物鼻上細微線條刻劃也會完全相同.模損等情況不計.
我個人不相信依目前技術能全盤仿製在原幣大小的錢幣上.
前面A.B.C.D四圖除非您能證明圖文的各相對位置細節完全相同.否則就非同模..
幣模雕刻工具與刻工刀法都有時代的特徵..老錢幣刻工為滿工..整個幣面圖文刻得細膩精緻.後仿刀工大而化之.在立體層次的轉折處交代不清.呈現斷崖式.
個人認為所謂的掌握機制特徵就是掌握刻鑿痕..或許錢幣鑑定公司也該朝此方向思考.

錢幣看真.看假並無對錯之分.至多只是反應眼力的高下而已..看法是否正確...等時機到了...自會明白..

linlaujiou · « **Reply #49 on:** April 14, 2017, 10:44:33 PM »

首發..

老錢幣除了歷史價值.文物價值.還可遇見藝術價值.

不怕被仿.只怕不懂停歇欣賞

poconopenn · « **Reply #50 on:** April 15, 2017, 11:00:19 PM »

For those members who can not read Chinese, the discussion in this thread is related to the importance of knife marks on the detection of counterfeit coin.

Linlaujiou claims that coin with visible knife marks is always genuine, since the knife marks can not be copied. In his opinion, the four coins with identical deep scratches/marks in the same area of the device are genuine, since knife marks are clearly visible in those coins. He further claims that NGC MS64 coin posted in Reply #41 is a counterfeit, based on artificial toning, lack of 3-dimentional details in Chinese characters, incorrect style of Chinese character at 3 o’clock, die crack lines are added to the fake die and the shape and size of dots in the inner circle is too uniform to be considered as genuine, most likely is made by a computerized machine.

IMO, the knife marks can be copied, similar to the scratches lines. Clearly, those four coins were made with a die copied from a genuine/fake coin. The valuation of NGC MS64 coin was about $23,000 in 2010 HA auction.

Attached is a picture of the 1903 Fengtein silver dragon dollar found in website. IMO, this is another coin made by the same die for the four coins posted by linlaujiou. So we have quintuplet now. Additional pictures of NGC MS63 and PCGS XF details-tooled coins are also attached to show the dots of inner circle is quite uniform in size and shape without any extra material in the space between the dots.

Just for information,

Transfer dies are most common practice used by modern counterfeiter. A genuine coin is scarified to press into die steel to make a working (production) die. In general, the genuine coin will be about XF condition, since mint state coin is too costly for counterfeiter, especially for rare one. The working die so produced will have all defects such as scratch marks generated during the circulation of the original copied coin. The deep scratches will create lumps on the die surface, so the same scratches in the produced coin. Sometimes, the counterfeiter will try to remove those lumps by chipping or polishing the die surface. However, if the counterfeiter is not skillful enough to fix the die properly and remove too much die surface, the resulting coin will show small pimples or short raised lines at those areas. In order to remove/mask the pimples, raised lines and scratch marks from coin surface, the reproduced coin will be polished by the counterfeiter. The counterfeiter also will add additional marks to the surface to avoid the detection. The collectors shall always be very careful to study highly polished coin before buy.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #51 on:** April 16, 2017, 09:31:19 PM »

不要以為評級入盒就是真..個人看此兩枚NGC評級幣只是普通耗子藥..一眼假..描眼影技術有待磨練

poconopenn · « **Reply #52 on:** April 16, 2017, 11:09:29 PM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on April 16, 2017, 09:31:19 PM

不要以為評級入盒就是真..個人看此兩枚NGC評級幣只是普通耗子藥..一眼假..描眼影技術有待磨練

Please post picture of a genuine 1903 Fengtein silver dragon dollar, since you believe that all graded coins by NGC and PCGS are fake.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #53 on:** April 17, 2017, 04:00:31 AM »

1.何謂包漿漸層?....懂嗎?
2.只要適當表達個人對錢幣的看法即可.其他....淡然處之..才是人生最美的姿態.
3.Take it easy

poconopenn · « **Reply #54 on:** April 17, 2017, 12:06:30 PM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on April 17, 2017, 04:00:31 AM

1.何謂包漿漸層?....懂嗎?
2.只要適當表達個人對錢幣的看法即可.其他....淡然處之..才是人生最美的姿態.
3.Take it easy

This is a friendly forum to share information related to Chinese coins. Please post the pictures of your four "genuine" 1903 Fengtein silver dragon dollars, both obverse and reverse. This will allow us to compare your coins with NGC and PCGS certified coins which you claimed to be fake.

poconopenn · « **Reply #55 on:** April 17, 2017, 12:34:07 PM »

Here are high resolution pictures of PCGS MS64 1903 Fengtein silver dragon dollar Y-92 and Y-92.1(Manchu characters in center reversed).

linlaujiou · « **Reply #56 on:** April 21, 2017, 09:30:22 PM »

1. 謝謝再次提供PCGS64假幣入盒笑話兩則

2.   刀痕.鑿痕是構成幣面圖樣.文字.底版的一磚一瓦.
3.   包漿漸層的色澤差異會小至以單一鑿痕為單位.直接描線是阿呆.
4.   刀痕.鑿痕該怎麼看..會嗎?
5. 笑話6則打賞6杯咖啡N28

poconopenn · « **Reply #57 on:** April 23, 2017, 07:04:07 PM »

Thanks for such nice pictures of fake coins and provide excellent educational material for learning to spot the fake coin. Instead of posting the pictures of quadruplets of 1903 fake Fengtein Y92.1 Manchu characters in center reversed) which I had mentioned to be fake, you decided to post Y92, since I did not mention them to be fake when you posted the partial pictures in Reply #35. In fact, I can tell you now that two coins of Y92 are fake and twin as shown in the attached pictures. It was clear shown in the partial pictures posted in Reply #35 and now being confirmed by your completed pictures of both sides posted in Reply #56.

For most collectors, the chance of acquiring quadruplets and twin fake coins is very limited. I am just wondering if you are associated to counterfeit factory in China/Taiwan and trying to promote those fake coins at this forum.

Little Finger · « **Reply #58 on:** April 24, 2017, 12:12:16 AM »

Seems like the same scratches on both FengTien coins, the fakes are so good that you can only look at the fake wear to determine authenticity....

Bearcat · « **Reply #59 on:** April 24, 2017, 12:45:24 PM »

Thanks Poconopenn for your intelligent and direct comments... especially the point about possible ties to counterfeiters. Unfortunately clear comments about the "tells" of counterfeit coins educate the good guys, but also enable the bad guys to make fakes that are increasingly more difficult to detect.

PandaCollector · « **Reply #60 on:** April 24, 2017, 04:50:53 PM »

Quote from: Bearcat on April 24, 2017, 12:45:24 PM

Thanks Poconopenn for your intelligent and direct comments... especially the point about possible ties to counterfeiters. Unfortunately clear comments about the "tells" of counterfeit coins educate the good guys, but also enable the bad guys to make fakes that are increasingly more difficult to detect.

"For most collectors, the chance of acquiring quadruplets and twin fake coins is very limited. I am just wondering if you are associated to counterfeit factory in China/Taiwan and trying to promote those fake coins at this forum."

+1 to both Poconopenn and Bearcat. This is the reason I stopped updating the counterfeits section on pandacollector.com. It is dismaying to see new batches of counterfeits that address any publicly known flaws in previous fakes.

Best wishes,
Peter Anthony
China Pricepedia
www.pandacollector.com

poconopenn · « **Reply #61 on:** April 24, 2017, 05:37:44 PM »

Just want to show the above post by pandacollector is already shown up at Baidu search inside China.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #62 on:** May 13, 2017, 04:39:21 AM »

1.   我從事醫療服務業.只是業餘研究機制幣的愛好者.與任何造假份子無關.
2.   我是獨行俠.手上錢幣全都是自己花錢買來研究的.跟您一樣.沒有造假的本事.
3.   最近忙其他事情.沒進論壇.畢竟錢幣不是生活的全部
4.   先前已經貼圖讓你見識同模傷假幣的相似程度.
5.   圖中您標示紅圈內直線是屬陽刻凸起線條.與幣面刮傷呈現蝕刻不同.在造幣鋼模上刻劃才能呈現如此情況.再者.該等直線條實際粗細的程度.相信您沒工具也沒本事刻劃出來.
6.   兩枚錢幣刀痕鑿痕完全不同.並非同模.錢幣看真看假.總要說出假的理由及製造工藝.這兩枚錢幣的刀痕鑿痕是由何種工藝製造?您不妨說說.
7.   儲存圖片.放大即可觀察文字筆劃上刀痕鑿痕的差異.
8.   林杯說..底板上的陽刻線條也是寶奉版共同暗記.並非同模傷.
9.   把林杯當成造假的同路人.那是從門底縫裏看人.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #63 on:** May 13, 2017, 06:49:02 AM »

1.   同樣的底板陽刻暗記在寶奉版前輩奉天癸卯一兩也可見到.
2.   所謂暗記就是人為刻意的瑕疵.全幣綜觀無異樣.微觀有玄機.寶奉版以直線型態陽刻.就是告訴你這是人為刻意為之.放大看.兩寶奉直線陽刻線條刻法也不同
3.   奉天癸卯一兩的兩字陽刻暗記.綜觀會以為只是刮傷露銀.但以高解析呈相.就呈現該陽刻是有形立體樣態.全然有別於一般的鑄造堆銀.
4.   能參透造幣設計者的防偽巧思及暗記佈局是神交古人的最大成就感.設計暗記本身的虛虛實實.就是防偽的精神所在.
5.   造假者分不清固有暗記還是後天損傷.造假時會刻意全數抹滅呈現完美樣態.投你所好.
6.   你3人要記得掛號繳交學費.

poconopenn · « **Reply #64 on:** May 13, 2017, 06:35:58 PM »

Clearly, you will not quit to promote your fake coins. You had been identified as fake coin seller as early as 2013 inside China. The first coin posted in this thread was identified as fake by two other members of this forum besides myself.

Here is example of link related to the comments about you inside China.

http://club.icoin.cn/bbs/read.aspx?id=386644&p=0

Attached are screenshots of the comment mentioned in the above link, as well as google and baidu translations of the said comment. Unfortunately, the translations from both companies are very poor, since the comment contained many Chinese slangs. For example “初入泉坛的藏友” (new collectors of the forum) is being translated as “altar of the altar Tibetan friends” and “spring altar Tibet” by google and baidu respectively.

In summary, the poster suggested that you always claimed graded coins and high quality coins sold by the reputable auction houses to be fake and your low quality and wore coins, most likely bought from street venders, as genuine. By postings and discussing with other collectors in the forum about your research, your tried to seduce new collectors of the forum to buy those fake coins.

By the way, the two coins, which you claimed to have a valuation of RMB 100,000/each, posted in Reply #31 are also fake twin. By posting twin, IMO, you were trying subtly to attract members of this forum to buy your extra.

Bearcat · « **Reply #65 on:** May 14, 2017, 09:42:16 PM »

Great work poconopenn! Nice detective work on two continents to unmask the culprit and foil his scheme. Unfortunately, for every bad guy we catch, seems like 100 spring up. We must all be vigilant...

Anthony H · « **Reply #66 on:** May 14, 2017, 10:51:06 PM »

WOW! I AM AMAZED BY YOUR DETECTIVE WORK! There are so many counterfeiters and forgers today faking all these silver dollars. Kiangnan, Hupeh, etc. Thank you! We must be vigilant indeed!

linlaujiou · « **Reply #67 on:** May 15, 2017, 05:18:30 AM »

.關於你鏈結的那枚NGC中華民國十六年造孫中山陵墓幣.我一直認為是枚假幣.在錢幣論壇裏有不同的看法是常有的事.錢幣認真.靠見識.錢幣認假.靠勇氣.真假之間糾葛的是利益與顏面.因此林杯說.錢幣易懂.人心難測..更何況.那些批評我的人.對錢幣的看法就正確了嗎?
2.回歸主題.就幣論幣.那兩枚寶奉版.你不敢承認誤判成同模傷.說成是假幣.何苦要施展墨魚戰術.模糊焦點.勇敢面對吧.承認錯誤不可恥.可恥的是死不認錯.高鼻子洋人好像不是這個樣.
3.任何論壇都有一夥造假護假售假的幫眾.在相互掩護.打擊不同看法的人.這種情況.司空見慣.是你少見多怪.還是做賊喊捉賊.林杯淡然處之.
4.你鏈結那枚十六年造孫中山陵墓幣我看是假幣始終如一.你敢提出來.想必你是看真的了.附圖標記紅線處.你不妨說說你的看法.
5.你實在太小瞧我了.如果我要淪落到靠賣錢幣謀生.我晚景堪憐了.請你不要以小人之心度君子之腹.切記.
6.接受沒有實力的褒獎.往往註定是悲劇的開始.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #68 on:** May 15, 2017, 06:50:48 AM »

1.   林杯來此論壇目的是與機制幣同好分享對機制幣真假判斷的看法.爾後對非研討錢幣的人身攻擊.一概不予回應.
2.   個人收藏錢幣是為自身陪葬品預做準備.只買不賣.但是.歡迎你來陪葬.
3.   林杯陸續接收中國舊社會錢幣藏家.幣商後代悉數藏品已達7家.今後將繼續買進.以豐富陪葬品.
4.   欽此..公告週知

pandamonium · « **Reply #69 on:** May 15, 2017, 08:45:43 AM »

Do the Empire small silver 50 C, 20 C, 10 C & 5 C have tons of fakes too?........ I was told there are small silver fakes but they have not been exposed like the silver dollars have........

poconopenn · « **Reply #70 on:** May 15, 2017, 05:31:31 PM »

Attached book has clear pictures and description of wear patterns for all US circulated coins. By study this book and examine the wear patterns of graded Imperial and Republic coins found at websites, the collectors can learn the technique to spot the counterfeit coins without even checking the design of the coins. The fake coins usually have many surface defects during the coping process and need to polish the surface of dies or coins to remove those defects, therefore, the wear pattern will be changed accordingly.

The pictures posted by linlaujiao are good examples of the incorrect wear patterns.

fwang2450 · « **Reply #71 on:** May 15, 2017, 07:45:40 PM »

林先生，歡迎您來論壇。本論壇懂機制幣的人不多，有您加入，無論是普及還是深入討論，都是好事。不過您開的這個貼子弄到現在氣氛已經不正常。部分原因是您的風格。本壇一向彼此坦誠相待，知無不盡。poconopenn見到他認為的同模傷，提出疑問，很正常。您不必因此採用故弄玄虛的口吻。天外有天。不說別的，您那些放大鏡下拍的照片實在不敢恭維。拍不出高清大圖，如何討論刀痕這樣的細節？下面是手雕章古塔上的刀痕細節照片，供您參考。

最后還有一點疑問。您英文不太好，本壇又不擅長機制幣，您為何不去用中文專門討論機制幣的論壇深入探討，而要來本壇做普及工作？

KeepOnTrying! · « **Reply #72 on:** May 15, 2017, 09:16:13 PM »

Quote from: fwang2450 on May 15, 2017, 07:45:40 PM

林先生，歡迎您來論壇。本論壇懂機制幣的人不多，有您加入，無論是普及還是深入討論，都是好事。不過您開的這個貼子弄到現在氣氛已經不正常。部分原因是您的風格。本壇一向彼此坦誠相待，知無不盡。poconopenn見到他認為的同模傷，提出疑問，很正常。您不必因此採用故弄玄虛的口吻。天外有天。不說別的，您那些放大鏡下拍的照片實在不敢恭維。拍不出高清大圖，如何討論刀痕這樣的細節？下面是手雕章古塔上的刀痕細節照片，供您參考。

最后還有一點疑問。您英文不太好，本壇又不擅長機制幣，您為何不去用中文專門討論機制幣的論壇深入探討，而要來本壇做普及工作？

Fwang do you mind translating this so that we can follow the discussion? Thanks.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #73 on:** May 16, 2017, 08:56:32 AM »

Quote from: fwang2450 on May 15, 2017, 07:45:40 PM

林先生，歡迎您來論壇。本論壇懂機制幣的人不多，有您加入，無論是普及還是深入討論，都是好事。不過您開的這個貼子弄到現在氣氛已經不正常。部分原因是您的風格。本壇一向彼此坦誠相待，知無不盡。poconopenn見到他認為的同模傷，提出疑問，很正常。您不必因此採用故弄玄虛的口吻。天外有天。不說別的，您那些放大鏡下拍的照片實在不敢恭維。拍不出高清大圖，如何討論刀痕這樣的細節？下面是手雕章古塔上的刀痕細節照片，供您參考。

最后還有一點疑問。您英文不太好，本壇又不擅長機制幣，您為何不去用中文專門討論機制幣的論壇深入探討，而要來本壇做普及工作？

1.   非常感謝您的寶貴建議及忠言.若因之前個人辭意表達造成誤會.我願在此向POCONOPEEN表達誠摯的道歉.
2.   就是因為個人經歷許多錢幣論壇歷練.深知黑暗的一面.想要遏止假幣的氾濫.一枚一枚揭假.永遠趕不及假幣製造及入盒的速度.
3.   一家錢幣鑑定公司的老闆親口對我說.他到中國參觀假幣工廠時.造假工廠老闆拿出一籮筐假幣.要鑑定公司老闆自己挑選品相能入盒的入盒去賣.該鑑定公司老闆嘴裏雖說沒有拿.但是.實際上早已在做球員兼裁判的鑑定幣買賣生意.
4.   我個人一直在鑽研機制幣.深知玩藏機制幣的不管新手.老手普遍都存在對錢幣真假的不確定感.老生常談的掌握機制特徵也缺乏精確有效的方法.
5.   經過個人反覆的思考及驗證.將其簡化成.所謂的掌握機制特徵就是掌握幣面圖樣.文字的刀痕.鑿痕.因為造幣鋼模就是用刀鑿刻的.鋼模上的刀痕鑿痕會經由冷沖壓忠實的反擊在錢幣表面.因此觀察不同枚同幣種錢幣表面相同位置的鑿痕.馬上就能判斷是否同模幣.精細的刀痕鑿痕也是造假業者永遠無法踰越的鴻溝.
6.   不同時代的雕刻工具.刻工.刻法.都有差異.老錢幣是整個幣面滿工雕刻.雕刻手法細膩精緻.與您的貼圖比較刀鑿痕就有天差地別.
7.   雕刻工藝有別於繪畫工藝.上頭十六年造孫中山陵墓幣的人像刻劃眼睛像貓眼.洋娃娃眼.這是幼稚園小朋友都懂的繪畫技巧.1927年維也納造幣廠的雕刻工匠人物眼睛雕法就不是這麼刻的.所以看眼睛就知是枚假幣.
8.   請您仔細看我上頭貼圖寶字各筆劃上的微細條狀鑿痕.倘使您能領悟.也讓外國朋友們知道如何觀察.只要好好利用拍攝技巧直接拍出幣面刀痕鑿痕.錢幣真假的判斷是直接有效的.
9.   唯有讓人人都懂如何判斷錢幣真假.才是遏止假幣氾濫的最好方法.這就是我來此論壇的目的.

poconopenn · « **Reply #74 on:** May 16, 2017, 01:49:44 PM »

Here are more examples to show the incorrect wear pattern of your reproduction coin. As shown in picture one, besides of identical scratch lines, the flattened shape and size of those dots in black box also identical for these two different coins and in F condition which does not match the VF/+ condition of the coin . In the second picture, the box shows two different wear patterns, dentals are flat which matches wear pattern of scales, but the relief at edge shows very limited wear. The high relief at edge was the result of minting process during the reproduction. Those fake coins, most likely, were minted many years ago, In recent years, the counterfeiters have better equipment and made many improvement and they do not make this type mistake anymore.

The information mentioned above is well-known to contemporary counterfeiters, but can be helpful to those new collectors to detect low quality fake made many years ago as shown in this thread.

fwang2450 · « **Reply #75 on:** May 16, 2017, 04:49:16 PM »

Quote from: KeepOnTrying! on May 15, 2017, 09:16:13 PM

Fwang do you mind translating this so that we can follow the discussion? Thanks.

Here is a quick translation:
Welcome to the forum, Mr. Lin. Not that many members on this forum have expertise on the old silver dollars, and so it is nice to have you here, whether for education or for deep-going discussions. However, the post you started is not going in the right direction now, partly because of your style. This forum encourages honesty and straight talk. Poconopenn saw what he deemed to be identical scratches from transferred dies and spoke up. This is normal. You don't need to resort to some kind of joking/playful tone because of his challenge. There is always someone better out there. Other points aside, the photos you took under magnification leave a lot of room for improvement. Without high-definition pictures, how can one discuss details such as knife marks? I am offering some pictures of the knife marks on the hand-engraved Ancient Pagoda medal, for your reference.

Lastly, I am a little puzzled. Your command of English is not that good, and old Chinese silver dollars are not the focus of this forum. Why spend time on educating this forum instead of going to Chinese speaking forums specialized in old silver coins for detailed discussions?

fwang2450 · « **Reply #76 on:** May 16, 2017, 05:06:36 PM »

Quote from: poconopenn on May 16, 2017, 01:49:44 PM

Here are more examples to show the incorrect wear pattern of your reproduction coin. As shown in picture one, besides of identical scratch lines, the flattened shape and size of those dots in black box also identical for these two different coins and in F condition which does not match the VF/+ condition of the coin . In the second picture, the box shows two different wear patterns, dentals are flat which matches wear pattern of scales, but the relief at edge shows very limited wear. The high relief at edge was the result of minting process during the reproduction. Those fake coins, most likely, were minted many years ago, In recent years, the counterfeiters have better equipment and made many improvement and they do not make this type mistake anymore.

The information mentioned above is well-known to contemporary counterfeiters, but can be helpful to those new collectors to detect low quality fake made many years ago as shown in this thread.

Good catch and very educating. I am learning.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #77 on:** May 16, 2017, 08:10:45 PM »

Quote from: poconopenn on May 16, 2017, 01:49:44 PM

Here are more examples to show the incorrect wear pattern of your reproduction coin. As shown in picture one, besides of identical scratch lines, the flattened shape and size of those dots in black box also identical for these two different coins and in F condition which does not match the VF/+ condition of the coin . In the second picture, the box shows two different wear patterns, dentals are flat which matches wear pattern of scales, but the relief at edge shows very limited wear. The high relief at edge was the result of minting process during the reproduction. Those fake coins, most likely, were minted many years ago, In recent years, the counterfeiters have better equipment and made many improvement and they do not make this type mistake anymore.

The information mentioned above is well-known to contemporary counterfeiters, but can be helpful to those new collectors to detect low quality fake made many years ago as shown in this thread.

您好..所示陽刻凸起直線線條.並非磨損.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #78 on:** May 16, 2017, 08:16:44 PM »

1.   fwang2450的貼圖驗證了一位中國現代造幣廠首席雕模技師的專訪.他提到現代機制幣幣模的設計製造已全部交由電腦與機器處理.雕模技師的作用.只剩在做最後的幣模修飾.因為最後的人工刻鑿痕就是最好的防偽.因此貼圖裏的鑿痕功用看來已無美感的需要.
2.   中國老錢幣的設計製造.摻雜造幣設計者的防偽巧思.藉由精湛的雕模技巧.成為落實在幣面圖樣.文字裏的暗記佈局..真正的中國古老機制幣.在文字筆劃.筆觸中絕對具有一致性的設計理念.所以說高手單看字就能識真假.
3.   就以十六年造孫中山陵墓幣來說.幣面文字的防偽設計理念.同樣具有一致性.也就是說該幣幾乎所有文字的長橫劃在與其他筆劃交錯處會開始呈現分節.粗細.立體.及角度變化.這些刻意變化的設計.更突顯出假幣文字的平淡無奇.庸庸碌碌.
4.   個人認為如想透徹中國古老機制幣.認識中文字是有必要的.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #79 on:** May 16, 2017, 08:37:11 PM »

1.   關於判斷機制幣的真假.在數年前我就已經決定不再以評級入盒幣做為真假的依據.
2.   流通幣版式多.那就以樣幣為例.只要蒐集多數量相同幣種評級入盒幣.再分別比對各幣細部特徵.將會發現該等所謂樣幣全非同模.那到底何者為真.我得到的結論是…全假.
3.   歡迎以同樣方式驗證.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #80 on:** May 17, 2017, 12:49:59 AM »

1.底板暗記型態多變.附圖為陽刻陰刻同時對照存在的底板掀層暗記.
2.兩枚寶奉版不同模.紅圈標示平行直線陽刻凸起線條為寶奉版共同暗記.陽刻暗記的缺點是容易遭磨損消失.
3.在論壇裏.只要適當表達自己對錢幣的看法即可..因為每個人對機制特徵的領悟不同. 看法沒有對錯之分.也不用嘗試說服他人接受自己觀點.眼力決定視界.淡然處之.等時機到了.自會明白.

fwang2450 · « **Reply #81 on:** May 17, 2017, 11:40:47 AM »

林先生，我貼的那張圖裡是古塔銅章，完全用手工在1：1的鋼模上陰刻出來。上海造幣廠八十年代初做了一批手雕銅章，是當時的設計/雕刻師練手用的。這些手雕章的最後一道工藝，是磨平，把手雕痕跡去除，但是這些文字被漏掉了。這些不是修模痕。我請這套章的設計師兼雕刻師曾成滬先生看過這些照片，他自己都不知道有這些痕跡。其實塔基上也有手雕痕。我沒有拍大圖。後來再版的章上就很平滑。

您說的暗記不能完全令人信服。這些痕跡沒有特定的形狀、位置、特徵，不像人工特地所為。換句話說，您的暗記說無法提出反證，那就無法討論下去，因為您可以把任何位置出現的任何形狀的痕跡都說成暗記，只要它們重複就行。修模痕也可以說成暗記，工作模上的磕碰也可以說成暗記。這些暗記看作模具特徵比較合適，可以是真模具上的特徵，也可以是假模具上的特徵。

poconopenn · « **Reply #82 on:** May 17, 2017, 03:49:01 PM »

The definition of hidden mark of coin is a very small mark which can only be detected under the high power magnifier and usually are hidden inside the design (raised part of device) not on the field (flat surface). It does not make any sense when you claimed those long and shape scratched lines and large marks (as shown in your latest post) on the flat surface of the device as hidden marks. The field of the device is always smooth and flat. Any marks or raised lines on the field are caused by contact during the circulation or defected production die. Your claiming those marks on the field as either knife marks or hidden marks is just totally wrong.

The knife marks usually will not visible when the circulated coin with a condition below VF, since knife marks are only on the raised part of the device, not on the flat surface of the coin. Attached picture (copied from SANDC’s picture in the pagoda thread) is a good example of long knife marks from hand engraved pagoda medal as mentioned by Fwang in his post. It is clearly visible in UNC condition.

Please post pictures of the whole device, not a small section of the coin. The determination of authenticity of the coin has to be based on the whole device, not a small section or knife marks.

Up to now, you have not responded to my comments about the “incorrect wear patterns” of your coins.

fwang2450 · « **Reply #83 on:** May 17, 2017, 04:48:56 PM »

林先生，再次提醒一下。您的拍照能力與您要研究的題目遠遠不符。要研究刀痕、修模痕、字體的細小變化這些微觀特徵，您得先拍出清晰的照片才能與眾人溝通、討論。以下是拇指大的一分流通硬幣的照片。第三張上可以看出年號上的mechanical doubling。您也可以去vamworld.com上看看美國人研究摩根銀幣細節時拍的照片。您用放大鏡拍的照片無論在色彩還是清晰度上都不盡人意。也許您自己看慣了，不覺得。別人看起來花眼。

Little Finger · « **Reply #84 on:** May 17, 2017, 09:19:04 PM »

Flower eyes, lol.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #85 on:** May 18, 2017, 09:31:39 PM »

1.   首發.百十年來連龍的傳人也未見的長鬚龍樣幣真面目截圖.
2.   龍首兩道造幣設計者防偽巧思一致性的蝕刻暗記.成功防偽.也讓錢幣鑑定公司的實力蒙塵..
3.   龍首兩道蝕刻暗記佈局.造成龍面破相.個人認為這是長鬚龍宣統三年未能成為流通幣主角的首要原因.
4.   理解幣面瑕疵的成因.絕對有助於錢幣真假的判斷.
5.   某家錢幣鑑定公司老闆對我說.樣幣精美.沒有暗記.聽聞此言當下.是林杯打自斷奶以後所受到的最大一次驚嚇.
6.   為了正確傳承.須大膽.堅持.合作.克服逆境.
7.   驗證歷史.非賣品….撿漏當撿如此漏.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #86 on:** May 18, 2017, 10:54:58 PM »

多謝諸位朋友回帖指教..個人對現代幣沒有涉獵研究.
君子於其所不知.蓋闕如也.僅會參考回帖內容.但不會表示意見.尚祈見諒.

poconopenn · « **Reply #87 on:** May 19, 2017, 04:16:32 PM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on May 18, 2017, 09:31:39 PM

1.   首發.百十年來連龍的傳人也未見的長鬚龍樣幣真面目截圖.
2.   龍首兩道造幣設計者防偽巧思一致性的蝕刻暗記.成功防偽.也讓錢幣鑑定公司的實力蒙塵..
3.   龍首兩道蝕刻暗記佈局.造成龍面破相.個人認為這是長鬚龍宣統三年未能成為流通幣主角的首要原因.
4.   理解幣面瑕疵的成因.絕對有助於錢幣真假的判斷.
5.   某家錢幣鑑定公司老闆對我說.樣幣精美.沒有暗記.聽聞此言當下.是林杯打自斷奶以後所受到的最大一次驚嚇.
6.   為了正確傳承.須大膽.堅持.合作.克服逆境.
7.   驗證歷史.非賣品….撿漏當撿如此漏.

As I have stated many times, the hidden marks/ knife marks will not be able to see if the coin is in VF condition. Your claim of those scratch marks as hidden marks/knife marks is simply false and total illogical.

[/quote]

Quote from: fwang2450 on May 17, 2017, 04:48:56 PM

林先生，再次提醒一下。您的拍照能力與您要研究的題目遠遠不符。要研究刀痕、修模痕、字體的細小變化這些微觀特徵，您得先拍出清晰的照片才能與眾人溝通、討論。以下是拇指大的一分流通硬幣的照片。第三張上可以看出年號上的mechanical doubling。您也可以去vamworld.com上看看美國人研究摩根銀幣細節時拍的照片。您用放大鏡拍的照片無論在色彩還是清晰度上都不盡人意。也許您自己看慣了，不覺得。別人看起來花眼。

Frank,

Very nice picture. It shows not only mechanical doubling, but also shows the coin is made with a poorly polished working die (hairlines are only on the field, not on the design).

linlaujiou · « **Reply #88 on:** May 31, 2017, 04:06:25 AM »

1.   民國三年袁大頭發行流通超過5億枚.版式超過1000種.唯獨L.GIORGI英文簽字版僅試鑄樣幣即成絕響.原因何在?百年來始終是個謎. 樣幣既然精美.在無其他外在條件制約下.為何不能發行流通使用..可見必有隱情.
2.   1910至1919年9月.義籍L.GIORGI在中國造幣廠擔任首席雕模技師職務.直接參與了宣三大清銀幣至民國八年造袁大頭的造幣鋼模雕製.
3.   1914民國三年袁大頭試鑄簽字版.L.GIORGI藝高膽大.在袁像鬍子旁底板設計了陽刻漸層防偽暗記.有破相疑慮.與1911宣統三年長鬚龍破相(有前例)結局相同.均被當局禁止發行流通.這就是真相.
4.   驗證歷史.非賣品.保真機制.撿漏當撿如此漏.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #89 on:** May 31, 2017, 05:13:24 AM »

海不擇眾川故能成其大..不同看法需要的是理解.而非被迫服從.日後有心人自會驗證不同看法的對與錯...

但是.如果隨便就把人扣上宣傳假幣的屎盆子.那就不對了.

錢幣是否符合機制?所貼圖文細節已足可說明.差別只在個人能否領悟而已.倘若無法領悟.再多言語也是多餘.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #90 on:** June 09, 2017, 11:14:03 PM »

1.   首發錢幣真相…..光緒十年吉林廠平壹兩
2.   傳統中國人雕刻擅長用刀.見識刻工及刻刀痕
3.   玩藏錢幣.倘若一輩子都不識真相.那才是最大的悲哀.
4.   錢幣博物館倘若收藏贗品充數.則是自愚愚人的最大笑話..
5.   驗證歷史.非賣品.保真機制.撿漏當撿如此漏.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #91 on:** June 16, 2017, 09:08:47 AM »

1.首發錢幣真相截圖....浙江省造魏碑體字光緒元寶七錢二分
2.魏碑體字筆觸渾厚圓融立體感強.撿漏當撿如此漏.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #92 on:** June 22, 2017, 09:24:50 PM »

1.   首發錢幣真相……1900庚子京局製造光緒元寶七錢二分.兩版圖文細節諸多不同.請自行比對.
2.   刻制幣模. 斗膽搞破相觸犯龍顏的也只有洋人.清末造假.沒這等狗膽.近現代造假.沒這等智商.
3.   真假幣最大的差異在於龍圖立體感的呈現.真幣龍首仿若飛天迎面而來.
4.   A.B兩版龍圖12點鐘方向背面中文字相同.邊齒型態一致.
5.   驗證歷史.保真機制.非賣品.撿漏當撿如此漏

linlaujiou · « **Reply #93 on:** June 30, 2017, 11:48:57 PM »

1.   首發上海銀餅真相…1856咸豐六年郁森盛豐年造壹兩足紋銀餅三版共同暗記.
2.   幣面任何瑕疵都有其成因.理解瑕疵的成因.絕對有助於錢幣真假的判斷.
3.   發現真正機制幣具有相同的幣面瑕疵特徵.一版無動於衷.二版喜形於色.三版納頭便拜.
4.   銀餅兩面皆為文字.刻制多組鋼模.字形無法全然相同.此幣種為防偽目的.在底板設計眾多陽刻凸起線條暗記.相同位置邊道設計成道中有道.瞎子摸幣亦能大致判斷真偽.另由文字筆劃邊緣殘存褐黃色油脂.大致能判斷當年經手銀餅相關行業類別.
5.   類似的底板陽刻線條共同暗記.在中外通寶關平銀壹兩.及光緒十四年貴州官爐造銀餅念寶均有發現.至於底板陽刻點狀共同暗記則在戶部庫平一兩.及丁未雙龍一兩有所發現.
6.   玩藏錢幣.訊息的獲得.錢幣的入手皆是緣份.不以名利為前提的錢幣研究自能迭有奇遇.這就叫….老天有眼.

poconopenn · « **Reply #94 on:** July 01, 2017, 03:46:19 PM »

Quote from: linlaujiou on June 30, 2017, 11:48:57 PM

1.   首發上海銀餅真相…1856咸豐六年郁森盛豐年造壹兩足紋銀餅三版共同暗記.
2.   幣面任何瑕疵都有其成因.理解瑕疵的成因.絕對有助於錢幣真假的判斷.
3.   發現真正機制幣具有相同的幣面瑕疵特徵.一版無動於衷.二版喜形於色.三版納頭便拜.
4.   銀餅兩面皆為文字.刻制多組鋼模.字形無法全然相同.此幣種為防偽目的.在底板設計眾多陽刻凸起線條暗記.相同位置邊道設計成道中有道.瞎子摸幣亦能大致判斷真偽.另由文字筆劃邊緣殘存褐黃色油脂.大致能判斷當年經手銀餅相關行業類別.
5.   類似的底板陽刻線條共同暗記.在中外通寶關平銀壹兩.及光緒十四年貴州官爐造銀餅念寶均有發現.至於底板陽刻點狀共同暗記則在戶部庫平一兩.及丁未雙龍一兩有所發現.
6.   玩藏錢幣.訊息的獲得.錢幣的入手皆是緣份.不以名利為前提的錢幣研究自能迭有奇遇.這就叫….老天有眼.

The "hidden mark" will not be easily detected and will not be very long scratched lines as shown in the pictures. They are clearly counterfeit.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #95 on:** July 03, 2017, 08:36:53 PM »

1.   真幣只是比假幣多添加了叫智商的成份.當初造幣設計者的防偽巧思並不奢望全部的人都會懂.只要有部份智商達標的人能懂就夠了.
2.   所謂的貓爪痕細線條.只要以側光看底板平整度.肉眼即可清楚發現.這些存在於不同版的陽刻細線條位置固定.個人猜想是以事先設計好的套件套在完工的個別幣模上.在該套件預留的細縫處以鎢鋼針逐一劃線.以智商完成大部分人認為不可能的防偽設計.
3.   清代科技相較落後於列強.造幣機器均得向列強購買.造幣技術對環伺的列強而言只是小菜一碟.對有價貨幣的積極防偽以維護自身利益.絕對是大清國的優先考量.
4.   玩錢起初著眼在錢文.圖樣.珠圈.馬齒.邊齒.到後來才醒悟底板也是大有文章的地方.
5.   附圖為世上所有錢幣博物館均無緣收藏的高智商光緒元寶滿文截圖.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #96 on:** July 06, 2017, 02:45:41 AM »

1.   上下圖比較1897德國人刻模功力.光緒元寶滿文四字.
2.   錢幣防偽設計與造假是場諜對諜的永久較量.智商及技術水平質量低的註定要落敗.搞錢幣鑑定.力有未逮就不該勉強.發出評級假幣.好比庸醫看病.
3.   牢記中國孔老夫子的訓示..知之為知之.不知為不知.是知也.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #97 on:** July 19, 2017, 08:34:55 PM »

1.   玩藏機制幣.我不信權威.只是盡力收集錢幣實物來驗證歷史傳說.
2.   史上相傳戶部庫平一兩是大清國光緒29年委請日本大阪造幣廠雕制25組幣模.1911宣統三年立龍伍角輔幣應流通量需求模組數料應更多..但相關實際數據歷史全無記載.
3.   中國舊社會某幣商曾收藏48枚宣三伍角立龍.其後代多年前整批釋出後.個人是承接的第三手.除了前手留存兩枚作紀念.其餘46枚全數買進.
4.   46枚中除一枚屬複打幣.其餘45枚在照相.仔細比對後發現.45枚均分屬不同版別.推測前手留存的兩枚也是不同版別.
5.   如果宣三伍角曾在流通市場流通過.想必該幣商收藏的48枚伍角立龍中一定會出現多數枚相同版別.其實並沒有.所以這提供一項有力證據.宣三伍角只是承造出版別試打幣.卻來不及大量製造流通.清朝就已覆滅.
6.   單憑肉眼觀察根本無法輕鬆分辨45枚版別差異.在清朝覆滅前風雨飄搖的時刻.該幣商有本事搞到不同版別試打幣.不得不佩服他的能耐與定性.
7.   手裡的46枚宣三立龍.至今沒有一枚出手.實際上還惦記著前手那兩枚.發文只是告訴機制幣愛好者.有這麼一回事.1911宣統三年伍角立龍在清朝覆滅前完成刻制試打的幣模版別數為47.相信這數字有9成5以上的可信度.
8.   手中45枚宣三立龍上半截圖中幣面底板均有陽刻點狀及多線條共同暗記.龍首上方10點到2點邊道上另刻有2至4道細長條紋共同特徵.編號第7枚除外.伍字右上一朵小龍雲型態45枚刻法均不相同.此外龍身麟片型態大小不一.立體感強.明顯添加了智商成份…截圖容後另補.
9.   歡迎有心人繼續驗證.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #98 on:** July 28, 2017, 04:17:10 AM »

1.   1898奉天此幣種，百多年來幾人識真?
2.   1897奉天省造無干支七錢二分就更別提了！
3.   正確傳承的最大阻礙是涉嫌常業詐欺的鑑定公司.
4.   悲哀！

linlaujiou · « **Reply #99 on:** August 05, 2017, 08:38:38 PM »

見識1911曲鬚龍3版

linlaujiou · « **Reply #100 on:** August 17, 2017, 06:59:15 PM »

A. 論壇首發…….1908罕見長尾鬼面龍..
B. 北洋造不同版別真幣.在龍圖面龍爪指間..設有通用防偽暗記.
C. 前人所謂短尾..短雲..開雲.34字體異形.除缺共同暗記…壓力不足全非機制
D. 真幣難得一見.能瞇到就是福.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #101 on:** September 07, 2017, 07:27:04 PM »

1. 形似…已不再是鑑定的可靠依據
2. 刀工.刀法.刻刀痕的微觀視界.正考驗造假與鑑定本事.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #102 on:** September 18, 2017, 08:05:19 PM »

論壇首發….1911高清英文GIORGI簽字版真相

linlaujiou · « **Reply #103 on:** September 27, 2017, 08:10:52 PM »

論壇首發..1882光緒八年吉林廠平壹兩......真假對照

linlaujiou · « **Reply #104 on:** October 06, 2017, 07:35:29 PM »

論壇首發…1890光緒十六年山西官爐造足紋壹兩..真假對照
1.   真幣特徵..豐富的底板陽刻線條.字型.筆序.刻刀痕呈現立體感.
2.   體字骨上方為暗示..對照曲字筆序是含高智商成份的防偽設計.
3.   附圖足以揪出目前所有的假幣.
4.   N年前林杯在中國的錢幣論壇就提過..高手單看字就能識真假..可惜聽者渺渺.
5.   若能領悟…自能通體舒暢…

linlaujiou · « **Reply #105 on:** October 13, 2017, 11:12:14 PM »

論壇首發…1906丙午戶部中字壹兩……真假對照
真幣特徵.
1.   圖文線條較假幣纖細且邊際明確不含糊.刻刀痕.立體感.
2.   設有多處防偽暗記.如附圖光緒兩字右上方筆劃交角處.
3.   內圈水波紋19條.有些水波紋區塊中每條細看像油條.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #106 on:** October 23, 2017, 07:40:36 PM »

論壇首發..1908大清銀幣戌申吉字庫平一兩…真假對照

1.   號稱孤品樣幣的戌申吉字一兩確定有兩個版式.
2.   戌申吉字一兩的兩個版式直徑大小與前帖兩版戶部中字一兩及新疆省造光緒銀元庫平重一兩完全相同
3.   1906戶部中字一兩獨特的防偽巧思及暗記佈局.在1908戌申吉字一兩有異曲同工之妙.兩者除了底板陽刻線條暗記與字體筆劃間的陽刻暗記.戌申吉字一兩青出於藍..還多了底板及環珠邊緣的陽刻暗記.
4.   這唯二的證據顯示1908戌申吉字一兩與1906戶部中字一兩應該都是出自天津造幣總廠製造..而並非如傳言吉林銀元局製造.
5.   綜觀此幣種假幣或缺暗記特徵.或字體筆劃間多有沾粘.不像真幣筆劃間及環珠邊緣存在的陽刻暗記與相鄰主體筆劃邊緣有明確的分際.
6.   領悟附圖足以槍斃眼下此幣種所有的假幣.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #107 on:** October 25, 2017, 02:40:35 AM »

補圖…百年首見..1908大清銀幣戌申吉字一兩
1.A.B兩版龍圖TAEL….AE間陽刻線條暗記.
2.見識…..防偽比防賊還嚴密.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #108 on:** October 26, 2017, 04:07:08 AM »

更正…1908年為戊申..前兩帖圖文皆誤植為戌申..SORRY

linlaujiou · « **Reply #109 on:** November 06, 2017, 05:47:46 PM »

論壇首發…1928中華民國十七年甘肅省造孫像壹圓…
1.   真幣特徵..薄邊.直徑小於3.9公分.文字刻劃具立體感.十字中間隆起.年字下橫截角暗記.人像淺雕.背面黨徽看似平整.但在視覺上卻有中央隆起的效果.人像眼角至耳上有一細長陽刻線條疤痕記號.此處刻意破相的造幣防偽設計在後人造假過程中早已被抹去..之後以假仿假.與十六年造孫中山陵墓幣.十七年張作霖背雙旗大元帥紀念幣.此三幣種評級入盒.拍賣.皆無真幣.
2.   附圖為HA2014年4月芝加哥-世界钱币(#3032)
L&M-618, Kann-760, KM-Y410, XF Details (Surface Hairlines) NGC. Traces of remaining luster, with a bold strike and light contact marks. A very rare type. From The Robert Raymond Ruff Collection
3.   不要以為老藏家的藏品就一定都是真的.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #110 on:** November 19, 2017, 08:01:23 PM »

1.   補上帖圖..見識年字截角暗記.筆劃立體感.
2.   附圖採用前手拍攝錢幣圖樣截圖.
3.   錢幣拍攝背景用藍色.錢幣視覺色調會偏黃.這是常識.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #111 on:** November 24, 2017, 11:01:17 PM »

1.   論壇首發…1899清光緒25年陜西省造光緒元寶庫平七錢二分樣幣截圖…..兩版防偽巧思.暗記佈局探究分享.
2.   中文字體造型千變萬化.大致相同大不同.
3.   一版不咋樣..兩版對照就能頓悟個篤定了.
4.   機制幣防偽心思縝密.果能解密造幣設計者心思.自能神交古人.這才是玩藏錢幣的樂趣所在.
5.   眼力就是在持續不斷的細部比對中練就的…

linlaujiou · « **Reply #112 on:** December 05, 2017, 06:28:35 PM »

論壇首發..1911宣統三年大清銀幣壹圓…反龍三版截圖分享
1.   真幣特徵..龍圖龍雲前後立體層次分明雕工精湛.
2.   字面…滿文四字由右深雕往左逐漸淺雕.環珠1點鐘至8點鐘深雕往左側漸淺雕..邊道與馬齒連接處宣字往左花束呈波浪紋..宣字寶蓋橫劃呈現疊筆.斷筆..一版納悶.三版篤定.多項類似特徵料是造幣防偽設計..方便概分真假.或許也成為落選原因..
3.   三版龍面字面皆有芒絲細紋陽刻線條做為共同暗記特徵.
4.   假幣入盒就是在創造錯誤的錢幣歷史.
5.   唯有找出對的錢幣來驗證歷史.利用錢幣考古才是正途.
6.   .論壇所述..歡迎有心人繼續驗證..盡信無法進步….
7.   附圖A龍圖龍舌下缘為細線異物沾粘..提醒切莫錯仿..

linlaujiou · « **Reply #113 on:** December 05, 2017, 08:19:05 PM »

論壇首發....1921徐世昌仁壽同登...真相截圖分享

linlaujiou · « **Reply #114 on:** December 15, 2017, 06:53:41 AM »

論壇首發….1907丁未壹圓樣幣兩版與1908造幣總廠七錢二分……龍家族共同暗記真相揭密…
1.   相同造幣廠前後期設計製造的系列錢幣.防偽巧思與暗記佈局通常具有沿用的慣性.應是考量不搞複雜及易於統一辨偽.
2.   玩藏錢幣化繁為簡.就是要尋出同系列錢幣家族的特徵規律性..方便於尋真探真..
3.   1907丁未壹圓不同版樣幣在字面.龍面皆設有蝕刻共同暗記.1908造幣總廠沿用丁未壹圓龍圖..同時沿用了大部分的暗記佈局.甚至嚴謹如馬齒特徵亦極度相似.兩幣種最明顯差異在丁未壹圓龍眼附近有一道蝕刻切線造成破相.猜想就是丁未壹圓樣幣未能發行流通的原因.1908造幣總廠發行流通時就少了這道龍眼旁蝕刻切線.附圖一因左側採光拍攝未能顯現這道蝕刻切線....俺是故意的..給看垂直線…
4.   真幣查有不對稱圖文.及人為刻意的瑕疵暗記.蝕刻暗記多數是以非直線及不斷透的原則呈現.明示刻意人為…宣統三年長鬚龍亦如此...這就是所謂防偽設計的智商成分.
5.   1907丁未壹圓.1908造幣總廠兩幣種..在假幣入盒的衝擊下…全中國找不出幾枚真幣….事實就是如此…..歡迎有心人驗證..
6.   附圖一3枚造總龍截圖皆不同版.共同暗記知多少?..…

linlaujiou · « **Reply #115 on:** December 17, 2017, 06:23:40 PM »

補圖….
1.   一眼識丁未
2.   不同幣種不存在修模沿用之說.
3.   見識不對稱.非直線.不斷透.
4.   造假仍需努力..鑑定遙遙落後…橫批..都不用功..

linlaujiou · « **Reply #116 on:** December 18, 2017, 08:33:52 PM »

論壇首發…1899新疆省造光緒銀元庫平重七錢二分截圖
1. 錢幣…平淡無奇的文字圖樣.沒有真的可能.
2. 一字識真假…..新…字特色…字型鬆散..筆劃端圓鈍.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #117 on:** December 21, 2017, 03:49:09 AM »

論壇首發…1923中華民國十二年造…龍鳳壹圓截圖….真假對照
1.   真幣的圖文具立體感.細節鮮明銳利..刻刀痕.包漿漸層色澤差異可小至單一刻刀痕.是普天下造假.做舊尚未能逾越的罩門.
2.   附圖中兩枚NGC.PCGS評级假幣..用高倍燈源放大鏡.因假幣鑄造壓力不足幣面圖文.邊緣會呈現毛燥鬆散樣態..只需三秒.即可判假.利用此方式可輕易排除90%以上的假幣..這種便捷快篩.顯然錢幣鑑定公司尚未能領悟運用.
3.   據此..口袋再深…評级假幣也是買不完的……

linlaujiou · « **Reply #118 on:** January 21, 2018, 08:10:07 PM »

論壇首發…1911宣統三年大清銀幣壹圓…五龍
1.   短鬚龍造幣鋼模圖文輪廓大致底定.惜立體層次未竟全功.是急就章供參的樣幣.造形設計與長鬚龍版本不同.
2.   五龍.細看龍雲有大小.疏密.虛實之分.若要體現神龍騰雲駕霧.大且密實具層次的曲鬚龍較符合決策者要求.
3.   凡機制真幣.必設有人為刻意的瑕疵暗記.全幣綜觀無異樣.微觀有玄機.曲鬚龍相較之下較無破相之虞.字面也較精神.
4.   積弱不振的大清亟待振衰起弊.國幣的選擇傾向蓬勃朝氣.與曲鬚龍相較.其餘四款未能盡如人意.字面中文及英文也乏善可陳.
2.   雕刻刀.雕刻鑿整的鋼模. 綜觀幣面圖文底板至多呈現差不多的平整.完全光滑平整的是現代工藝品.
3.   不對稱設計是造幣防偽最簡單有效的手段.暗記是加保險.
4.   評级曲鬚無真幣…撿漏當撿如此漏.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #119 on:** January 22, 2018, 08:27:23 PM »

論壇首發…1922湖南省憲成立紀念壹圓…..真假對照
1. 此幣種已評级入盒的沒有真幣.
2. 沒有三分顏色..也敢開啟染坊……….真丟臉….

linlaujiou · « **Reply #120 on:** February 03, 2018, 08:51:03 PM »

論壇首發…1897吉林省造無紀年光緒元寶七錢二分花籃土吉擊寶三版……非同模傷共同暗記揭密.
1. 此幣種真幣選擇在字面元字右腳旁設計成環珠缺失.若單見一枚.會誤認是幣面磨損.見兩枚以上會誤認是同模傷假幣.所以鑑識圖樣清晰是必要的.附圖三異版字面珠圈斷口兩端環珠及十字星型態各異可證.環珠缺失若真屬磨損.元字右腳又豈能都安然無恙？..凡真幣手刻環珠型態各不相同.假幣環珠由電腦整造型規律一致.大元帥紀念幣外環五角星是如此.吉林十年廠平一兩外環小圓圈也是如此.
2. 錢幣本為流通用. 並非為百年後收藏..時日一久早晚會有磨損.既然如此造幣先造出磨損樣態何嘗不可.造幣巧思諜對諜----兵不厭詐.證實----造幣防偽第一.破相在所不惜..

linlaujiou · « **Reply #121 on:** February 09, 2018, 04:22:09 AM »

論壇首發---1901吉林省造辛丑太極七錢二分….防偽巧思揭密及真假對照…
1.   真正機制真幣.沒有所謂錯版..都是….故意的版.
2.   造幣設計者唯恐後人不辨真假.暗記設計常刻意營造出對照.其意是擔心後人智商不足無法領悟..且看吉字.上馬齒.下環珠.倒S尾與2互為對照明示其為故意.R字頭與N字頭蝕刻互為對照.
3.   此幣種已評级入盒的沒有真幣.真幣倒S設計的蝕刻防偽玄機.歷經117年依然不費吹灰之力KO所有造假與鑑定.
4.   倒S錯版之說….誰才是傻瓜?
5.   鑑古知今.真懂的少.唬爛的比九牛全毛還多…….

linlaujiou · « **Reply #122 on:** February 12, 2018, 06:31:38 PM »

續上帖補圖….1901吉林省造辛丑太極七錢二分龍圖3版
1.   同一幣種不同版別間設計了共同暗記利於辨識真假.個別版別另有個別暗記.只要找到多數枚詳加比較自能豁然開朗.
2.   附圖中此幣種共同暗記特徵在哪?
3.   上帖附圖3所述倒S蝕刻及R.N字頭蝕刻究為共同還是個別暗記.請自行驗證.
4.   莫盡信.勤快驗證才是進步根源......

linlaujiou · « **Reply #123 on:** February 12, 2018, 08:42:36 PM »

論壇首發….1916湖南洪憲元年中華銀幣壹圓….真假對照.
1.   能力不足以鑑識鑄造..又沒見過真幣..切莫隨口唬爛說是臆造…此枚ACCA評級入盒假幣一眼壓力不足..有練過的3秒就能讓它出局.
2.   真正機制真幣圖樣.筆劃綫條.底板表面不會全然光滑..龍鱗馬齒顆顆立體..凡刻鑿過必留下刻鑿痕跡…這是常識…
3.   真假差在哪???

linlaujiou · « **Reply #124 on:** February 13, 2018, 06:10:13 PM »

續上帖.補充說明
1.   FAKE A，FAKE B not the same one.
2.   兩枚假幣源自同一假幣當母模鑄造..因鑄工不良導致兩枚假幣鑄造瑕疵明顯不同.
3.   此幣種真幣在字面銀字金左腳附近幣面底板設有神秘暗記.由不同方向觀察.該暗記會有陽刻.蝕刻的視覺轉換錯覺.是非常具智慧的防偽手段及雕刻技巧.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #125 on:** February 18, 2018, 06:52:31 PM »

論壇首發….農曆新年獻禮，9枚罕見一兩機制真幣，得見不虚此生。

1. 中外通寶關平銀壹兩3版，中字壹兩2版，吉字一兩2版，甘肅省造乙巳庫平一兩，新疆省造庫平重一兩。
2. 歡迎各方同好親自上手研究一新耳目，讓不懂裝懂的唬爛者一一現形。

Womanofvalor · « **Reply #126 on:** February 22, 2018, 06:36:14 PM »

Where are the best overseas vendors I can buy empire coins from?

linlaujiou · « **Reply #127 on:** February 25, 2018, 07:08:42 AM »

論壇首發…1928中華民國十七年大元帥紀念幣廬山真面目
1.   大元帥紀念幣號稱為中國天津造幣總廠末代機制人像幣的典範，該人像五官皮膚，肌肉，骨骼的雕刻立體效果，宛如精美的黑白相片。
2.   林杯N年前歷經8個月時間研究才完全破解此幣種防偽巧思及暗記佈局。真幣手刻外環五星顆顆立體.型態相異。假幣靠人工智慧整得規律一致。真幣人像右側緣底板另設有蝕刻暗記。
3.   中國東北瀋陽大帥府博物館收藏的大元帥紀念幣並非真幣，此由遼寧省政府曾舉辦提供的重要文物選拔圖片一看就知。過往所有評级入盒及拍賣的此幣種皆無真幣。
4.   世間若有與此枚品項相當的真品樣幣，林杯願以NTD.2099萬元收購以供對比研究。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #128 on:** February 27, 2018, 08:54:03 PM »

論壇首發…1916中華帝國洪憲紀元2版袁像廬山真面目
1.   此2版同樣印證防偽第一，破相在所不惜。
2.   這2版外國人口稱的fat man 都有明顯雙下巴。
3.   A版袁像右側脖子有兩處蝕刻對照暗記，頰側與耳上帽帶繫節互為淺深蝕刻對照暗記。
4.   B版袁像兩耳外側緣各有蝕刻對照暗記，左肩章有蝕刻暗記，其餘暗記不在截圖內，有心人可按圖索驥。
5.   2版袁像五官包括眉眼、鼻子、鬍鬚、口唇、兩耳，刻工雕法諸多雷同，研判岀自同一雕刻技師之手。
6.   此2版皆有少量發行餽贈擁護中華帝國洪憲紀元的達官貴人，在此2版背飛龍下方底版空白處研判刻有受贈者名號，在袁氏83天皇帝夢破滅後，相同位置的受贈者名號悉數遭磨除避嫌，就是這段歷史的直接證據。
7.   飛龍幣面同樣設計了多樣共同暗記，待有心人自行驗證。
8.   百年老幣的幣面圖文多有風化滄桑感，這是偽造做舊難以模仿的歲月底韻。
9.   找出對的錢幣驗證錢幣歷史，讓唬爛者閉嘴，還真相一個公道，千山獨行，無悔。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #129 on:** March 02, 2018, 07:35:08 PM »

補圖…1916中華帝國洪憲紀元袁像飛龍2版袁像廬山真面目
1.   此幣種版別共同暗記設在飛龍面。
2.   在不同顏色背景拍攝錢幣，錢幣所呈現色調當然不同。
3.   完美無暇的中國近代錢幣絕對是糖衣毒藥，卻恰好是造假、護假、售假、鑑定的最愛。
4.   上大圖供參，見識高手是怎麼雕刻的幣模，真假線索就藏在細節裏，放大你的評级幣比比看，到底誰在唬爛？？？

linlaujiou · « **Reply #130 on:** March 09, 2018, 07:58:28 AM »

論壇首發….1889廣東省造七三反版…字面真面目

見識空模 die clash

linlaujiou · « **Reply #131 on:** March 12, 2018, 06:27:14 AM »

論壇首發….1928貴州汽車幣AUTO DOLLAR
1.   政字末筆劃尾端藏有雕刻師SB英文縮寫簽字.
2.   錢字金造型雕刻展現創意.
3.   幣面多處藏有防偽玄機.
4.   附圖2為前手拍攝.看到錢字金.立即勇敢買進

linlaujiou · « **Reply #132 on:** March 15, 2018, 09:37:09 PM »

補圖....1889廣東省造七三反版..龍圖...廬山真面目

撿漏當撿如此漏....

linlaujiou · « **Reply #133 on:** March 23, 2018, 03:29:40 AM »

論壇首發….1924中華民國執政紀念幣背和平……
1. 段祺瑞...廬山真面目…印證防偽第一…破相在所不惜..
2. 假幣濫竽充數大量入盒..真幣當然不值了…

linlaujiou · « **Reply #134 on:** March 23, 2018, 08:18:42 PM »

論壇首發…1898戊戌安徽省造光緒元寶七錢二分..真相截圖
1.   真假幣本質上最大的差異就在有無立體感及刻鑿痕，這就是造幣設計的智商成分。
2.   百年老幣表面的風化滄桑感是歲月淬練的成果.人為做舊難以模仿.
3.   假幣百款圖文各自表述.文字筆觸大致相同大不同.細心比較自能發現其間差異.
4.   奉獻大圖…比比看啥才叫真…..

linlaujiou · « **Reply #135 on:** March 27, 2018, 08:10:59 AM »

論壇首發….1928中華民國十七年甘肅省造孫像黨徽壹圓
1.   寬邊版截圖……君不見黃河之水天上來的防偽巧思
2.   印證….防偽第一….破相在所不惜…
3.   薄邊版破相處在耳上眼側.相當醒目..個人設想當初此幣種發行流通主力應為寬邊版.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #136 on:** March 31, 2018, 09:33:26 PM »

論壇首發….1894廣東省造壽字雙龍七錢二….真相揭密
1.   壽字旁環狀珠圈暗記明示慈禧60大壽，壽字橫劃上分佈諸多小圓圈蝕刻暗記，是否有特殊涵義尚待解密。
2.   字面分佈許多不同型態的陽刻暗記，幾乎全是不同版別間的共同暗記，一眼就能識真假。
3.   雙龍壽字幣存世稀少原因，除了史傳甲午戰敗不宜大肆張揚祝壽，個人從造幣防偽設計中隱約嗅岀光緒帝親政後新舊勢力間的明爭暗鬥，舊勢力為延續既得權勢，藉祝壽幣向慈禧輸誠表明擁戴，此從字面光字週遭兩處明顯陽刻暗記，與造字口內陽刻暗記互為對照，對光緒帝嘲諷奚落的不敬不言可喻，為了避免光緒慈禧間關係惡化，此祝壽幣終被大量銷毀應屬意料中事。
4.   歡迎有心人接續驗證。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #137 on:** April 05, 2018, 07:06:49 PM »

論壇首發….1900吉林省造光緒元寶庚子花籃七錢二分…真相截圖
1.   具有平滑圖文底版筆劃表面的錢幣，只是現代工藝品而非機制幣。
2.   舉例，在平滑鏡面上灑上細沙，再利用雕刻刀、雕刻鑿將細沙清除，最終鏡面上佈滿刻鑿痕，絕不可能恢復光潔平滑鏡面。
3.   具有智商成分的刻鑿痕，才是機制真幣的直接證據。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #138 on:** April 06, 2018, 08:25:56 PM »

論壇首發…1907丁未壹圓2版、1908造幣總廠2版…廬山真面目
1.   實物證據顯示，1908造幣總廠所採用的背龍圖完全承襲1907丁未壹圓龍圖，兩幣種的防偽巧思、暗記佈局、甚或邊道馬齒皆極度相似，充其量只是手工雕模的些微版別差異而已。
2.   切莫輕視邊道馬齒的防偽地位，幣王奉天癸卯壹兩幣種有大小龍眼兩版，邊道馬齒部位即有蝕刻及陽刻兩種不同的版別暗記，提供有心人參考。
3.   同時提供兩幣種大圖供參，不要玩藏一輩子，都不曉得真幣長啥樣？
那才叫…………悲哀！！！

linlaujiou · « **Reply #139 on:** April 29, 2018, 10:32:13 PM »

論壇首發…1912軍政府造四川銀幣大點金…..真假對照
1. 已如前述，平滑的幣面圖文沒有真的可能。
附圖1、2出處http://jd.cang.com/1049906.html......請自行參閱
2. 附圖5…..A版幣面蝕刻特徵，何處有可能是此幣種的共同暗記？

linlaujiou · « **Reply #140 on:** May 01, 2018, 08:36:10 PM »

承上帖補圖……B版供參。
總結假幣特徵……
1.   欠缺防偽智商成分及手工雕模精湛刀鑿痕。
2.   無機制沖壓立體感及老幣氧化包漿漸層。
3.   圖文邊際混沌不清。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #141 on:** May 14, 2018, 06:59:34 PM »

論壇首發..1894湖北省造背本省光緒元寶七錢二分..真假對照
   1.綜觀機制幣防偽設計理念是以最大變數為原則，傳言背本省的省字與字面省字神似，是不懂裝懂的唬爛說詞。

   2.截圖文字筆觸大致相同大不同，真幣筆觸圓融，假幣筆觸尖硬。
   3.仔細欣賞圖文刻鑿工法，讓唬爛現形，還真相一個公道。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #142 on:** May 14, 2018, 07:27:53 PM »

承上帖，另補三版截圖供參。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #143 on:** May 18, 2018, 09:31:42 PM »

論壇首發…1889廣東省造七三反版….真假對照

linlaujiou · « **Reply #144 on:** May 29, 2018, 07:30:21 PM »

論壇首發…1856咸豐六年上海郁森盛一兩足紋銀餅......真相截圖
1. 見識不同時代的雕刻技法自成獨特的防偽功能。
2. 蝕刻暗記是機制幣最基本防偽手段也是辨真偽最後一道防線。

skyline2go · « **Reply #145 on:** June 10, 2018, 01:25:27 PM »

Nice post. Thank you.. linlaujiou

linlaujiou · « **Reply #146 on:** June 12, 2018, 09:08:02 PM »

論壇首發…1916中華帝國洪憲紀元..袁像飛龍紀念幣….真相揭密……承續Reply＃＃ 128，129
1.   袁像飛龍紀念幣共承造2版式用以致贈擁護洪憲紀元的當朝達官貴人，飛龍幣面空白處另行刻劃個別受贈者名號，當洪憲紀元垮台後，受贈者為避免遭受牽連，銷毀及磨滅錢幣上名號的舉動，讓此幣種減損存世更為稀少。
2.   此二版式袁像飛龍紀念幣在飛龍幣面設計有多款防偽共同暗記，飛龍尾部以斷筆折尾突顯立體感的蝕刻暗記是此幣種防偽的最後一道防綫，也是一眼識真假的罩門所在。
3.   外環馬齒採蝕刻空心馬齒序列，截圖中9點鐘方向設有一實心馬齒暗記。
4.   中華帝國中字採疊筆刻劃，國字口上橫斷筆防偽。
5.   機制幣嚴格遵守一個幣模一個樣，相同版式相對位置的微細刻鑿痕必定也是全然相同，現代影像科技已能拍出單一刻鑿痕，不怕被仿。
6.   已如前述，找出對的錢幣來驗證錢幣歷史，讓不懂裝懂的唬爛者現形，還真相一個公道。共勉之〜〜〜
7.   塵封百年錢幣秘密解惑…別再浪費血汗錢購買評級入盒假幣了。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #147 on:** July 07, 2018, 09:11:40 PM »

論壇首發…1925李景林紀念幣背雙旗截圖….真假對照
1. 真幣五角星右上角採破相防偽設計，頂角上蝕刻小旗蝕刻綫未穿透珠鍊，五星是此幣種一眼識真假的防偽罩門。
2. 國字口下短橫斷筆，民字下橫非直線。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #148 on:** July 15, 2018, 07:25:55 PM »

論壇首發…1890光緒十六年山西官爐造足紋壹兩截圖…真假對照

linlaujiou · « **Reply #149 on:** July 17, 2018, 08:00:38 PM »

論壇首發…1907喀什大清銀幣湘平壹兩….真相揭秘
1.   已如前述，平滑的幣面圖文，沒有真的可能。
2.   大致相同大不同，一個大字就能幫你剃除此幣種所有的假幣。
3.   好好領悟機制真幣特徵，刀鑿痕、立體感、防偽暗記、包漿漸層。
4.   信林杯，可撿漏。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #150 on:** August 01, 2018, 07:13:14 PM »

中外機制真幣共同特徵
1.刀鑿痕
2.立體感
3.防偽暗記
4.包漿漸層

linlaujiou · « **Reply #151 on:** August 10, 2018, 04:21:42 AM »

論壇首發…..1911站洋截圖…..真假對照
1.   平滑的幣面圖文，沒有真的可能。
2.   幣面瑕疵成因的分析，絕對有助於錢幣真假的判斷。
3.   大致相同大不同，判斷真假的線索就藏在細節裡。
4.   比較真假幣…刀鑿痕、立體感、防偽暗記、包漿漸層。
5.   教育是抑假揚真最根本的手段。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #152 on:** August 12, 2018, 09:50:45 PM »

論壇首發...長見識...

百一十年來首見1908....34年北洋造...俺取名為長尾鬼面龍....截圖分享

Endeavour · « **Reply #153 on:** September 19, 2018, 11:38:21 AM »

What are the characters on the top of the reverse? Do they translate to anything or is it a design feature?

linlaujiou · « **Reply #154 on:** September 20, 2018, 08:58:58 PM »

1.   為凸顯設計理念，刀鑿刻製鋼模造就的圖文暗記等邊際線條角度皆是深刻明確的。
2.   暗記是人為刻意設計造就含有智商成分的瑕疵，其存在常表現出無獨有偶的相對性、一致性、對照性，布局則隱含明示.暗示的善意提醒。
3.   幣面瑕疵成因的分析，究為先天設計造就，抑或後天磕碰劃戳等人為不經意或刻意造舊損傷，絕對有助於錢幣真假的判斷。
4.   錢幣外表的樣態，反映其存世歷經的滄桑，每枚真幣皆有其獨特的故事，它一如過往無私地對任何人坦白，靜待有心人去膫解。
5.   機制幣真假的辨識，有其一定的脈絡章法可依循，努力細部比對是研究錢幣唯一的捷徑。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #155 on:** September 21, 2018, 11:44:17 PM »

圖為1900庚子江南省造光緒元寶七錢二分截圖.
乃2016.01.15與奉天癸卯一兩等共10枚同時入手.

Endeavour · « **Reply #156 on:** September 21, 2018, 11:52:37 PM »

Quote from: Endeavour on September 19, 2018, 11:38:21 AM

What are the characters on the top of the reverse? Do they translate to anything or is it a design feature?

Never mind, if anyone was wondering like me what the 4 characters above mean, it's Manchurian, the first two characters being the Emperor's name and the last two being the third year of his rule.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #157 on:** September 26, 2018, 02:49:10 AM »

1.已如前述.平滑的幣面圖文沒有真的可能.

2.幣面圖文看不出任何智商成分的防偽設計.必假無疑.

3.真幣特徵.刀鑿痕.立體感.防偽暗記.包漿漸層.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #158 on:** October 02, 2018, 09:08:26 PM »

1.   真假細部對照
2.   評級假幣圖樣來自www.coin007.com/bbs/read.php?tid=29455
3.   假幣入盒正在造就錯誤的錢幣歷史
4.   有識之士自當勇於撥亂反正.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #159 on:** October 14, 2018, 10:07:36 PM »

1934中華蘇維埃共和國川陝省造幣廠造壹圓銀幣截圖
1.附圖A版截圖中此幣種防偽共同暗記何處有？
2.先考驗眼力，B版截圖對照……另補。
3.遙想當年紅色政權第五次反圍剿人力物力維艱，紅軍幣發行照樣設有防偽共同暗記。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #160 on:** October 17, 2018, 08:09:58 PM »

1.   紅框標示4處蝕刻防偽共同暗記，其餘請自行參照比對。
2.   機制幣製作、鑑定皆有一定的章法脈絡可依循。
3.   防偽暗記是人為刻意設計的瑕疵，以蝕刻、陽刻的方式表現在幣面邊道、馬齒、圖文、底板等處無所不在。
4.   幣面欠缺智商成分的防偽暗記………幣假無疑。

linlaujiou · « **Reply #161 on:** October 29, 2018, 03:06:04 AM »

附圖出自..
https://goods.ruten.com.tw/item/show?21825240005155#
【評級假幣】雲南省造光緒元寶庫平七錢二分新雲南銀幣ACCA XF45
https://tw.bid.yahoo.com/item/七錢二分光緒元寶新雲南省造壹枚金盾PCGSVF鑑定幣-100385957607
雲南省造新龍真相揭秘－－－
1.   真假差異藏在細節裡，刀鑿痕－刻模、立體感－雕工、防偽暗記－智商、包漿漸層－歲月。
2.   真幣包漿漸層差異可小至單一刀鑿痕，與假幣人為做舊大面積呈現同色調有天壤之別。
3.   真幣圖文蝕刻處邊際明確耐磨滅，真相持久。
4.   真幣放大，刀鑿痕雕工依舊生動精采。假幣放大，看糊。
5.   新龍字面滿文漢字筆畫刀鑿痕、立體感蝕刻防偽設計多樣，假幣欠缺智商成分，多屬以假仿假字形臆造平庸，真假附圖對照……下回另補。

dragondollar · « **Reply #162 on:** October 30, 2018, 05:19:51 AM »

I don't understand why this user is not banned, they are actively spreading disinformation.

The 1934 dollars posted above are crude, obvious fakes.

Here is a nice original one for comparison:

As you can see, however crude the design and strike may be, the characters and design are sharp, and the planchet has the typical defects and raised hairlines of Red Army coinage.

Also, there is no "A版" or "B版", Szechuan-Shensi soviet dollars varieties are identified by the style of the stars on the reverse. The coin above is a Y513.5, which has large solid stars. Its obverse is actually the same than the rarest variety, the Y513 with large, decorative stars.

You can compare the Y513.5:
http://www.dragondollar.com/coins/chinese-soviet-republic/red-october/

With the Y513:
http://www.dragondollar.com/coins/chinese-coins-2/communist-china-szechuan-shensi-soviet-dollar/

(
btw, in case this fraudulent user tries to assert his crude fakes are real and my coins are not good, my Y513 is the plate coin in the reference book for Chinese communist currencies, and was chosen by NGC to illustrate the Y513 type :
https://www.ngccoin.com/price-guide/world/china-early-soviet-szechuan-shensi-soviet-dollar-y-513-1934-cuid-1045675-duid-1291549
)

linlaujiou · « **Reply #163 on:** October 30, 2018, 07:26:35 PM »

YOU SAY~~~
Also, there is no "A版" or "B版", Szechuan-Shensi soviet dollars varieties are identified by the style of the stars on the reverse. The coin above is a Y513.5, which has large solid stars. Its obverse is actually the same than the rarest variety, the Y513 with large, decorative stars.
此外，沒有“A版”或“B版”，Szechuan-Shensi蘇維埃元的品種都被反過來的星星風格所識別。上面的硬幣是Y513.5，有大的實心星。它的正面實際上與最稀有的品種Y513相同，它們帶有大型裝飾星。
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I SAY~~~ YOUR TWO COINS NOT THE SAME TYPE.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #164 on:** November 08, 2018, 06:31:25 PM »

續前帖補圖……教你如何一眼識真假
1.老話一句，平滑的幣面圖文沒有真的可能。
2.蝕刻暗記是機制幣防偽的基本配備。
3.環珠造型也是表現雕工、防偽的舞台。
4.留意圖文筆觸與其周遭底板刀鑿痕的延續表現。
5.附圖庫字、緒字防偽巧思。
N年前，林杯在中國錢幣論壇就留下兩句話~~~~~
1.高手單看字就能識真假。
2.不懂裝懂，早晚會鬧笑話。
Continue to post the map... teach you how to see the true and false
1. As the old saying goes, smooth coin graphics are not really possible.
2. Etching and memorization is the basic equipment for anti-counterfeiting of mechanism coins.
3. Ring bead shape is also a stage for performing engraving and anti-counterfeiting.
4. Intentional strokes and continuation of the knives of the floor knives.
5. Attached to the 庫 word, the緒 word anti-counterfeiting ingenuity.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #165 on:** December 12, 2018, 08:55:52 PM »

論壇首發..1909-11雲南省造宣統元寶七錢二分…真假對照
造假與鑑定尚未成功，仍需努力！！
Forum starting: 1909-11 YUN-NAN- PROVINCE, Xuantong Yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS... true and false comparison

Fraud and identification have not been successful, still need to work hard! !

雲南意即雲下，雲字上橫故意隱沒，南字頭頂立體防偽巧思，與1914中華民國三年袁大頭五分側臉英文簽字版背嘉禾壹字頭頂防偽，有異曲同工之妙。
Yunnan is the meaning of the cloud, the cloud word is intentionally hidden, the 南 word head stereo anti-counterfeit ingenuity, and the 1914 Republic of China three-year Yuan Datou five-point side face English signature version of the back Jiahe 壹 word top anti-counterfeiting, there is a similar skill.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #166 on:** December 12, 2018, 10:43:34 PM »

論壇首發…1914短馬齒七分臉無簽名異配版真相截圖
1. 無簽名其實只是直接把錢幣表面的英文簽名刮除，無關幣模。
2. 欣賞防偽巧思、暗記佈局、精湛雕工，這才是錢幣的真正價值所在。

Forum starting...1914 short fangs seven points face no signature dissimilar version truth screenshot
1. No signature is actually just scraping the English signature on the surface of the coin, regardless of the currency model.
2. Appreciate the anti-counterfeiting ingenuity, the secret layout, and the exquisite carving. This is the real value of the coin.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #167 on:** December 13, 2018, 07:23:41 PM »

論壇首發…快速鑑識1914袁大頭側臉壹圓英文簽字版
1. 生命短暫，不宜浪費太多時間與假幣周旋。
2. 信我者，可撿漏。

Forum debut...Quick identify 1914 Yuan Datou side face one dollar English signed version
1. Life is short, it is not appropriate to waste too much time with counterfeit currency.
2. Trust me, you can find it.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #168 on:** January 04, 2019, 05:02:46 AM »

論壇首發…Open collar 1912黎元洪開國紀念幣免冠開領版….真相截圖
1.   免冠開領版顧名思義就是一種暗記設在衣領處的暗記版別
2.   百多年來一直未曾見過開領版真實圖像，而所謂暗記就是人為刻意造就的瑕疵，此瑕疵若無真確刀鑿痕可證明係人為，沒人有十足把握膽敢稱是開領版。
3.   開領版幣面開國紀念幣的開字筆畫上造幣設計了蝕刻暗記，似乎在暗示開領版也是屬於一種蝕刻暗記。
4.   雕模技師在以刀鑿營造開領的暗記形態表現時，當時採用的燈源方向就決定了視界要呈現的暗記形態。
5.   第二、第三截圖是以不同方向光源實拍錢幣，見識何謂免冠開領版。
6.   塵封百餘年神秘，今朝得見，此生無憾。
Forum starting... Open collar 1912 Li Yuan Hong Kaiguo commemorative coin free crown open collar version.... Truth screenshot
1. The title-free open-collar version, as the name suggests, is a secret version of the mark on the collar.
2. For more than a hundred years, no people seen the real image of the open-collar version, and the so-called secret note is a kind of deliberate creation. If there is no such thing as a knife, it can prove that it is artificial. No one has the full grasp and dare to call it a open collar. Version.
3. Open-collected version of the coin-opening commemorative coin on the 開 strokes on the coin design of the etching secret, seems to imply that the open-collar version is also an etching secret.
4. When the sculpt technician is performing in the form of a knives and chiseling to create a open-collar, the direction of the light source used at that time determines the sacred form of the Vision.
5. The second and third screenshots are real shots of coins in different directions, and see what is the title-free open collar version.
6. The open collar version has been mysterious for more than a hundred years. anyone can see it now. There is no regret in this life.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #169 on:** January 07, 2019, 08:06:14 PM »

論壇首發…1916袁像飛龍英文簽字版真假對照
1.首先很遺憾告訴各位，此幣種評級入盒的沒有真幣。
2.袁像飛龍簽字版與非簽字版並非只是有無簽字差異而已，而是完全分屬不同版別。
3.有圖自有真相，見識真幣的刀鑿痕、立體感、防偽暗記、包漿漸層。
4.把截圖看仔細，以後別再傻買了。
Forum starting...1916 Yuan like Feilong English signature version true and false comparison
 1. First of all, I am sorry to tell you that there is no real coin in this currency rating.
 2. The signature and non-signed versions of Yuan Feilong are not only signed or not, but are completely different versions.
3. Have the truth of the picture, see the knife mark, the three-dimensional sense, the anti-counterfeit mark, and the grading of the pulp.
 4. Look at the screenshot carefully and don't buy it later.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #170 on:** January 12, 2019, 08:12:39 PM »

論壇首發…1929中華民國十八年孫像正面背三帆壹元英文簽字版………真假對照
機制幣刻製造幣鋼模的刀鑿痕是造假無法逾越的罩門

Forum starting... 1929 Republic of China 18 years front face back three sails English signed version ......... true and false comparison

linlaujiou · « **Reply #171 on:** January 14, 2019, 08:12:20 PM »

續上帖..補圖

linlaujiou · « **Reply #172 on:** January 18, 2019, 08:23:44 PM »

續上帖補圖…..禁止流通銀樣幣釋疑
1.   此幣種直徑約5公分，正反面幣模是以1比1比例人工刀鑿刻制。
2.   正反兩幣面符合機制特徵，全幣面刀鑿痕、立體感、防偽暗記、包漿漸層完備。
3.   現代此類工藝仿品以電腦字體充數，壓力不足、圖文細節不到位。
4.   此幣種個頭做大是為方便決策者把持審視，最終還會在圖文細節上做改進，並非定稿發行樣版，因有面額壹元，故禁止流通使用。
5.   紅框線華字，在所有機制幣華字裡，立體防偽獨樹一格，造幣巧思，古今仿幣遠遠望塵莫及。

Continued to post the map..... Prohibit the circulation of silver sample coins
1. The currency is about 5 cm in diameter, and the front and back coins are manually carving by a 1 to 1 ratio.
2. The positive and negative two-coin face conforms to the characteristics of the mechanism, and the full-note face is chiseled, three-dimensional, anti-counterfeit, and the grouting is complete.
3. Modern such replicas are filled with computer fonts, with insufficient pressure and insufficient graphic details.
4. This currency is bigger for the convenience of decision-makers. In the end, it will improve the details of the graphic. It is not the final version. Because there is a denomination, it is forbidden to use.
5. Red frame line Chinese word 華, in all the mechanism currency Chinese 華, three-dimensional anti-counterfeiting unique tree, coinage and ingenuity, ancient and modern imitation coins are far behind.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #173 on:** January 19, 2019, 09:23:39 PM »

續上帖補圖說明
1.   流通幣的發行，其使用的版式並非一蹴可幾，是經過一再改進的沿革。
2.   想要膫解這種改進過程，就必須找到對的銀樣幣。
3.   銀樣幣禁止流通現代工藝仿幣，其圖文直接採用流通幣版式，說明有智商的造假人才難找。
4.   1914中華民國三年袁大頭背嘉禾，其銀樣幣的嘉禾初始造幣設計如下，
A.   所有嘉禾無開芒
B.   長葉刻劃成深V
C.   嘉禾繫帶刻有摺痕
D.   九點鐘方向存在小內齒
   Continued post on the map
1. The circulation of the currency, it is a history of repeated improvements.
2. To understand this improvement process, you must find the right silver coin.
3. Silver-type coins are forbidden to circulate modern craft imitation coins, and their pictures and texts are directly adopted in circulation currency format, indicating that it is difficult to find fake talents with IQ.
4. 1914 Three years of the Republic of China Yuan Datou, Jiahe, the original coinage design of its silver-colored coins, is as follows,
A. All Jiahe no open mans
B. Long leaves are carved into deep V
C. Jiahe tie belt with creases
D. There is a small internal tooth at 9 o'clock.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #174 on:** January 31, 2019, 05:02:25 AM »

論壇首發..1927孫中山陵墓幣英文簽字版….真假對照
1. 天津造幣總廠第二號金牌雕模師KOSHSH雕製
孫中山陵墓幣簽字版有不同正反幣面二版。
2.老話一句，平滑的幣面圖文底板沒有真的可能。
Forum starting: 1927 Sun Yat-sen Mausoleum coins in English signed version.... true and false comparison
1. Tianjin Gold Co., Ltd. No. 2 Gold Medal Carver KOSHSH
Sun Yat-sen's tomb coin signature version has two different versions of the front and back currency.
2. As the old saying goes, there is no real possibility of smoothing the surface of the coin surface.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #175 on:** February 07, 2019, 08:24:43 PM »

論壇首發…1900庚子京局製造光緒元寶七錢二分…真相截圖
1.   N次強調，平滑的幣面圖文底板，沒有真的可能。
2.   高手單看字就能識真假，看清楚截圖，此幣種你也能3秒識真假。
3.   機制真幣英文數字滿文漢字筆劃在雕刻幣模時都會刻意營造立體感，如此才能顯現刻手的功力。
4.   佛度有緣人，以後別再傻買了。
Forum debut...1900庚子京局製造光緒元寶七錢二分... Truth screenshot
1. N times of emphasis, smooth coin surface, no real possibility.
2. Master can see the true and false by looking at the word, see the screenshot clearly, you can also know the true and false in this currency for 3 seconds.
3. Mechanisms of genuine coins English numbers Manchu Chinese characters strokes will deliberately create a three-dimensional sense when carving coins, so that they can show the skill of the hand.
4. Buddha is a good person, don’t buy it anymore.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #176 on:** February 13, 2019, 06:41:58 PM »

論壇首發..1914袁世凱七分臉無簽名短馬齒背大嘉禾異配2版
1. 欣賞義籍雕模技師的雕工
2. 刀鑿痕是機制真幣的指紋，同版式相同位置的刀鑿痕必定絕對相同。
Forum starting..1914 Yuan Shikai seven points face unsigned short horse teeth back Da Jiahe different match 2 version
1. Appreciate the engraving of the artisan carving technician
2. Knife-toothed marks are the fingerprints of the mechanism of real money, and the chisel marks of the same position in the same layout must be absolutely the same.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #177 on:** February 14, 2019, 04:01:12 AM »

論壇首發….1872美國限量貿易銀幣真假對照
沒有瑕疵不成幣

Forum starting....1872 US limited trade silver coins true and false comparison

linlaujiou · « **Reply #178 on:** February 15, 2019, 06:58:58 PM »

補圖….
1. 鑄造假幣是這種樣態
2. 一葉知秋，此幣種評級入盒的不會有真幣。
Supplementary map....
1. Casting counterfeit currency is like this
2. this currency will not have real money in the box.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #179 on:** March 12, 2019, 08:23:21 AM »

論壇首發…1873美國貿易銀….真假對照
1.   真幣代表13州的六星以及周邊每一馬齒立體型態皆不相同，這是手工刻模的特性。現代工藝假幣則型態單一規律一眼即可辨別。
2.   此幣種雖設計人物眼眶空洞，卻能簡單勾勒出充滿喜悅的神秘微笑引人遐思。這是此幣種最高明之處，相較假幣充滿狐疑的眼神，高下立判。
3.   真幣底板及人物皆設有蝕刻暗記，一點鐘方向馬齒亦設有陽刻暗記。
4.   老錢幣表面氧化風化在所難免，審視比較真假弊機制特徵，刀鑿痕、立體感、防偽暗記、包漿漸層。
5.   假幣對照圖為NGC PR63 屬假幣彩繪評級入盒。
6.   此幣種評級入盒的不可能有真幣。
Forum starting... 1873 US trade silver.... true and false comparison
1. The real coin represents the six stars of the 13 states and the three-dimensional shape of each dent is different. This is the characteristic of hand-engraving. Modern craft counterfeit currency can be discerned at a glance.
2. Although the design of this currency is empty, it can simply outline the mysterious smile full of joy. This is the highest point of this currency, compared to the fake money full of suspicious eyes, high judgment.
3. The bottom plate and the characters of the real coin are provided with etching secrets, and the one-pointed horse teeth also have a black mark.
4. Oxidation and weathering of the surface of old coins is inevitable, and the characteristics of the true and false mechanisms are examined. The chisel marks, the three-dimensional sense, the anti-counterfeiting, and the grading.
5. The counterfeit currency comparison chart is NGC PR63, which is a counterfeit currency painting rating box.
6. It is impossible to have a real coin in this currency rating.

poconopenn · « **Reply #180 on:** March 12, 2019, 01:23:56 PM »

Please do not post your reproduction as genuine coins. Both 1872 and 1873 trade dollars posted by you are low quality reproduction.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #181 on:** March 12, 2019, 06:50:42 PM »

Thank you poconopenn
1. There is no end to learning, welcome to post real money pictures to provide learning opportunities, thank you

linlaujiou · « **Reply #182 on:** March 17, 2019, 09:35:45 PM »

論壇首發…. King of Coins' 1804 Silver Dollar….真相揭密
1.   根據資料顯示美國此幣種有8＋7枚分3種形式
2.   相同幣種不同版別間一定設計有共同暗記特徵.
3.   我手上這枚幣王若以型態規格論，美國只存有一枚。
4.   錢幣真相特徵我簡略說三點，這是近200年來諸位未曾聽聞的秘密。
A.   真幣1804字母有明顯斷筆缺口
B.   老鷹鼻孔不是圓的
C.   老鷹前胸盾牌上橫條紋、下直條紋，條紋間隙是由英文書寫體蝕刻造成。
5.   上述三特徵，我拍得清楚，看得真切，歡迎有心人繼續驗證。
6.   此幣種評級入盒的沒有真幣，以後別再傻買了。

Forum debut.... King of Coins' 1804 Silver Dollar.... Truth reveals
1. According to the data, there are 8+7 pieces in this form in the United States.
2. There must be a common secret feature between different versions of the same currency.
3. In the case of this coin king, There have only one in the United States.
4. The truth of the coin. I briefly say three things. This is the secret that you have never heard of in the past 200 years.
A. The true currency 1804 letters have obvious broken pen gaps
B. The eagle's nostrils are not round
C. The eagle's front chest shield has horizontal stripes and lower straight stripes. The stripe gap is caused by the etching of the English writing body.
5. The above three characteristics, I made it clear, and I really see it. I welcome others to continue to verify.
6. There is no real coin in this currency rating, so don’t buy it later.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #183 on:** March 26, 2019, 06:53:37 AM »

論壇首發….. King of Coins' 1804 Silver Dollar 防偽巧思揭秘
1.   機制真幣一定會有加入智商成分的防偽設計。
2.   愈是年代久遠的錢幣，最初仿造時影像放大條件分不清真幣細節真相，於是假幣存世之後歷代以假仿假，甚至修改錢幣圖文細節，不明所以的人就會誤把假幣當成正宗。
3.   機制幣防偽巧思設計多樣，無非就是針對一般人刻板印象反其道而行。而破解防偽真相唯有借助刀鑿痕的呈現。刀鑿痕可做為老錢幣考古與鑑定真假無庸置疑。
4.   1804幣王老鷹幣面與邊道平坦屬淺雕，抗磨損難度更高，截圖所示防偽巧思如下，處處顛覆造假幣及評級業者的常規想像。
A.   老鷹上啄尖端不尖，呈小方形。
B.   老鷹鼻孔不圓，略呈方形。
C.   老鷹口銜繫繩，左下端尖銳，右端終止於下啄上，繫繩並非兩頭連貫。
D.   繫繩下橫幅廣告邊線的存在，左右兩邊不對稱，這是防偽慣用手法。
E.   廣告上蝕刻的英文字母採虛實雕刻工法，刀鑿痕可呈現造幣初始設計。約同時期的1833俄國雙頭鷹皇冠外圈陽刻文字存在相似防偽設計。
F.   老鷹盾牌上條紋間隙是以文字符號蝕刻形成條紋間隙，顛覆造假幣者慣用的直線條思維。
5.   美國現存8＋7的此幣種錢幣，如果細部特徵與此帖所陳述不合，個人認為美國幣王歷史有可能要改寫了。
6.   玩錢幣就是要找出對的錢幣來驗證錢幣歷史.
7.   假幣評級入盒就是在造就錯誤的錢幣歷史，推手就是歷史的罪人。
Forum debut..... King of Coins' 1804 Silver Dollar Anti-counterfeiting ingenuity
1. Mechanisms Genuine coins must have an anti-counterfeiting design that incorporates IQ components.
2. The more ancient coins, the original image magnification conditions can not tell the truth of the real money details, so after the existence of counterfeit currency, the past generations fake fake, and even modify the details of the coins, unknown people will mistake the fake currency as authentic .
3. The mechanism of counterfeit and ingenious design of the mechanism currency is nothing more than the opposite of the stereotype of the average person. The only way to crack the anti-counterfeiting truth is with the help of a knife. Knife and chisel can be used as an old coin archaeological and identification true and false.
4. 1804 coin king eagle coin face and side road flat is shallow carving, anti-wear is more difficult, the screenshot shows the anti-counterfeiting ingenuity as follows, subverting the fake money and the conventional imagination of the rating industry.
A. The eagle's upper jaw is not pointed and has a small square shape.
B. The eagle's nostrils are not round and slightly square.
C. The eagle has a tether, the left lower end is sharp, and the right end is terminated on the lower jaw. The tether is not coherent at both ends.
D. The presence of the banner edge under the tether, the left and right sides are asymmetrical, which is the anti-counterfeiting method.
E. The English letters etched on the advertisements are in the form of virtual engraving, and the chisel marks can be presented in the initial design of the coin. At about the same time, the 1833 Russian double-headed eagle crown outer ring has a similar anti-counterfeiting design.
F. The eagle shield's stripe gap is etched with text symbols to form a stripe gap, which subverts the straight line thinking of the counterfeit currency.
5. There are 8+7 coins in this currency in the United States. If the details are different from the ones in this post, I personally think that the history of the US dollar may be rewritten.
6. Playing coins is to find the right coin to verify the history of the coin.
7. The counterfeit currency rating into the box is to create the wrong coin history, and the pusher is the sinner of history.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #184 on:** April 04, 2019, 07:52:15 PM »

補圖…蓬髮女郎King of Coins' 1804 Silver Dollar
1.   見識美國人老祖宗1804幣王造幣鋼模是怎麼刻的
2.   刀鑿痕是機制特徵的直接證據
3.   善用放大鏡認識刀鑿痕
4.   附圖一1804幣王女郎頭髮的雕法，與附圖二1865年5Fr人物衣服皺摺雕法類似，具有相同世紀的特徵。
5.   此枚1804幣王是個人畢生收藏唯一的一枚，幣面幾乎無磨損，可拍出初始狀刀鑿痕，是研究美國幣王最佳標本，機制幣造幣設計與刻模均極為嚴謹，個人深信老鷹盾牌上的文字符號一定有其特殊含意，這需要專業人員協助。
6.   平心而論，這枚美國人引以為傲的幣王，最佳歸宿就是回到美國本土的博物館，有意收藏研究的單位或個人可與我聯繫。linlaujiou@gmail.com

Make up the picture... King of Coins' 1804 Silver Dollar
1. See how the American ancestor 1804 coin king coin-making steel mold is engraved
2. Knife and chisel marks are direct evidence of the characteristics of the mechanism
3. Use a magnifying glass to understand the knife and chisel
4. Figure 1 The carving method of the 1804 coin king girl's hair is similar to the Fig. 2 1865 5Fr character's wrinkle carving method, which has the characteristics of the same century.
5. This 1804 coin king is the only one in personal life collection. The coin surface is almost wear-free. It can be used to produce the original knife-cutting mark. It is the best specimen for studying the US dollar king. The mechanism coin coin design and engraving are extremely strict. The individual is convinced that the text symbol on the Eagle Shield must have its special meaning, which requires professional assistance.
6. In all fairness, this American is proud of the king of coins. The best destination is to return to the museums in the United States. Units or individuals interested in collecting research can contact me.

linlaujiou@gmail.com

dragondollar · « **Reply #185 on:** April 22, 2019, 02:27:28 AM »

@poconopenn : I was rather annoyed to see linlaujiou relentlessly posting pictures of very low quality fakes, but now I think I finally understand him. In a strange world where people actually do want to collect crappy "made in Taiwan" fakes rather than genuine coins, his posts would actually be 100% correct. In that case, we should help this man to collect "made in Taiwan" coins and in exchange he could trade us the originals

SANDAC · « **Reply #186 on:** April 22, 2019, 08:43:24 AM »

I have no expertise to determine whether they are genuine or fakes. I know many have pointed them out publicly or privately as fakes. I believe this series of posts is valuable because it serves as pictorial references of questionable coins from the Imperial and Republic era. As long as the author is not selling (he can't, with a karma of -21), I have no concerns with more posting of the questionable coins.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #187 on:** April 26, 2019, 07:58:09 AM »

書上沒教的常識
1.   手刻造幣鋼模，幣面圖樣文字筆劃就該有手刻的樣態。
2.   手工刻模刀鑿痕變數多，構成自然防偽。
3.   不同國家機制造幣，原理特徵大同小異。
4.   高手單看字就能辨識真假。
5.   .平滑的幣面圖文底版沒有真的可能。
6.   陽刻暗記與主體筆畫必有明確分際，刻意排除沾黏嫌疑。
7.   造幣設計有故意瑕疵才是真幣。

Common sense not taught in the book
1. Hand-engraved coin steel mold, the coin-shaped pattern strokes should have a hand-carved pattern.
2. Hand-engraved knives have many variables, which constitute natural anti-counterfeiting.
3. Different countries have different manufacturing machines, and the principle features are similar.
4. Master can see the true and false by looking at the word.
5. The smooth coin-surface graphic version is not really possible.
6. There must be a clear separation between the imperial seal and the main stroke, and the suspicion of disguise is deliberately excluded.
7. The coinage design has deliberate 瑕疵 is the real coin

linlaujiou · « **Reply #188 on:** April 26, 2019, 08:04:44 AM »

continue

linlaujiou · « **Reply #189 on:** April 27, 2019, 07:50:39 PM »

我手上的所有錢幣都是花錢買來研究的，對我而言，對機制真幣的尋真探真，比出售圖利更有意義。
每枚錢幣在入手前我都仔細比對過網路上所有能找到的錢幣圖片，真人不露相，真幣也是如此，稀有真幣的細部特徵，在網路圖片庫裡的錢幣圖片是找不到的。
覺今是而昨非，就是進步，發帖過程就是我個人學習的過程，有心人踩著我的步伐，可早日登堂入室一窺真相，錢幣截圖經得起驗證，免驚。
只要你有足夠實力，我的錢幣都可免費奉送，只希望後繼有人，別再讓不懂裝懂的唬爛者繼續欺騙天下。
All the coins in my hands are spent on money to study. For me, the truth-seeking of the mechanism of real money is more meaningful than the sale of Tuli.
Before I started, I carefully compared all the coins that I could find on the Internet. The real people didn't show up, the real money is also the same. The details of the rare real money, the coin pictures in the online photo library can not be found. .
I feel that today is nothing but progress, and the process of posting is my personal learning process. If someone has stepped on my steps, can go to the room as soon as possible to get a glimpse of the truth. The screenshots of the coins can stand the test and free worry.
As long as you have enough strength, my coins can be offered free of charge. I only hope that there will be successors. Don’t let the smashers who don’t know how to understand continue to deceive the world.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #190 on:** May 14, 2019, 09:26:47 PM »

機制幣的造幣防偽設計無非就是在圖樣文字筆畫的細節上動手腳，所以才說平滑的幣面圖文底板真不了。
The coin-operated anti-counterfeiting design of the mechanism currency is nothing more than the details of the strokes of the pattern text, so it is said that the smooth coin-face graphic bottom plate is really not.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #191 on:** May 16, 2019, 07:56:19 PM »

論壇首發….1926孫像正面背稻禾壹圓樣幣….真相揭秘
1.   沒有人為智商故意造就的瑕疵不成真幣
2.   體悟造幣防偽設計
3.   欣賞雕工刀鑿痕
4.   對截圖有意見的歡迎把自己手上錢幣放大比較

linlaujiou · « **Reply #192 on:** June 05, 2019, 05:36:30 AM »

論壇首發…1903戶部一兩…防偽巧思揭秘
1.   老精稀真幣值得用一生守候，真相也值得用一生等待。
2.   見識日本人造幣設計的息肉狀陽刻、蝕刻、對照等暗記佈局，另在中外通寶關平銀壹兩，上海壹兩也都可見到，敬請期待。
3.   不厭其煩發帖，就是為糾正ACCA~~樣幣精美沒有暗記~~這句~~~~~屁話。
4.   此幣種日本人老祖宗防偽心思縝密、佈局處處玄機，論鬥智，二戰偷襲珍珠港遠遠望塵莫及。
5.   老錢幣的幣胚合金輾壓技術確實留有進步的空間，成為當代歷史背景的見證。
Forum debut... 1903 HU POO ONE TAEL anti-counterfeiting ingenuity
1. The old and rare real coin is worth waiting for for a lifetime, and the truth is worth waiting for for a lifetime.
2. See the design of the Japanese man-made coin in the form of polyp, etch, contrast, etc., and also in the 中外通寶關平銀壹兩 , Shanghai one tael can also be seen, so stay tuned.
3. Do not bother to post, is to correct ACCA ~ ~ sample coins exquisite no secret ~ ~ this sentence ~~~~~ fart.

4. The Japanese ancestors of this currency have their own anti-counterfeiting ideas and their layouts are everywhere. on battle of wits, the attack on Pearl Harbor in World War II is far behind.
5. The old coin coin metal alloy rolling technology does leave room for improvement and becomes a witness to the contemporary historical background.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #193 on:** June 05, 2019, 05:44:19 AM »

補圖1903戶部一兩

linlaujiou · « **Reply #194 on:** July 02, 2019, 04:44:30 AM »

論壇首發…1929孫中山正面西服樣幣…..共同暗記揭秘
1.   讓造假不得好仿的細節，就是暗記。
2.   機制幣暗記是用刀鑿刻模呈現。
3.   現代高仿工藝假幣無刀鑿痕。
4.   雙旗地球有兩版，同樣具備共同暗記。
5.   此幣種真幣共同暗記...假模裂，從肩下往左第16個馬齒左側往上延伸至衣領。
Forum debut... 1929 Sun Yat-sen frontal suit sample coin.....to remember the secret
1. Let the details of fraud not be imitation, is to remember.
2. The mechanism coin is recorded with a knife and a chisel.
3. Modern high imitation craft counterfeit coins without knife and chisel.
4. There are two editions of the Double Flag Earth, which also have a common secret.
5. This currency is a true currency that bears a false impression of the crack, extending from the shoulder to the left of the 16th horse tooth to the collar.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #195 on:** July 24, 2019, 04:44:18 AM »

論壇首發…112年來首見…國寶級截圖…...
1907丁未雙龍一兩真相截圖…真假對照
1.   丁未雙龍一兩為中國近代銀元十大珍之首，堪稱國寶，百年難遇。
2.   假幣多過曬穀場的稻穀，查過圖片庫，名家說寶展示幣，全假。
3.   關於此幣種文字敘述、口述但稱海波紋者，全屬未見過真幣。
4.   見識防偽巧思及精湛雕工，一張截圖兩個字，足以掃除此幣種所有假幣。
5.   有不同意見的，歡迎把截圖放大貼上來，是驢是馬遛遛便知。

Forum starting... The first time in 112 years... National treasure screenshot...
1907 丁未雙龍一兩... true and false comparison
1.   Ding Wei Shuanglong is one of the top ten Chinese silver coins in modern times. It is called a national treasure, and it is a rare encounter in a hundred years.
2. Counterfeit money is more than the rice in the Sun Valley, check the picture library, the famous treasures show the coins, all fake.
3. Regarding the description and dictation of this currency, but the sea ripples, all of them have never seen real money.
4. See the anti-counterfeit ingenuity and superb engraving, a screenshot of two words, enough to sweep out all counterfeit coins in this currency.
5. If you have different opinions, you are welcome to put the screenshots up and down.

節錄
幣界認為，“光緒銀幣丁未一兩是光緒年間未流通的樣幣之一，作為近代銀元“十大珍”之首，其精湛的工藝與收藏價值一直為世人驚歎，目前存世量極其稀少。它是中國銀本位貨幣制度精美的代表，為了體現滿清皇權制度在貨幣領域的權威，其設計製造者不計成本地進行了精美絕倫的設計。其藝術水準、防偽能力迄今沒有被超越。是被國內外集藏界公認的中國近代銀幣大珍品”。
Excerpt
The currency circle believes that "one of the Guangxu silver coins is one of the uncirculated coins in the Guangxu period. As the first of the "Ten Treasures" of the modern silver dollar, its exquisite craftsmanship and collection value have always been amazed by the world. It is a beautiful representative of the Chinese silver standard currency system. In order to reflect the authority of the Manchurian imperial power system in the monetary field, its design and manufactureers have carried out exquisite design without cost. Their artistic level and anti-counterfeiting ability have not been surpassed so far. It is recognized as a large treasure of Chinese modern silver coins by the collections at home and abroad."

linlaujiou · « **Reply #196 on:** August 04, 2019, 06:49:57 PM »

論壇首發…1929孫中山正面西服禁止流通銀樣幣、試鑄樣幣共同暗記對照
1.   找出對的錢幣驗證錢幣歷史
2.   順藤摸瓜，史無前例的驚人發現。
3.   刀鑿痕的具體呈現有助於幣面瑕疵是造幣設計或後天損傷的判斷
The first session of the forum... 1929 Sun Yat-sen's frontal suit is forbidden to circulate silver sample coins, test casting coins and a common record
1. Find out the right coin to verify the coin history
2. Going to the ground. the Unprecedented discoveries.
3. The specific presentation of the knife and chisel marks helps the coin surface to be the coinage design or the judgment of the acquired damage.
節錄
样币只铸造一枚或者数枚，其目的不参与流通属于进程样钱，让皇上或者管理人员过目看看是否合格的钱币样板，外表铸造精美材质精良，存世量极少，一般混不到流通领域，
Excerpt
Only one or several pieces of sample coins are cast, and the purpose is not to participate in the circulation of process-like money. Let the emperor or the manager look at the qualified coin model. The appearance is exquisitely made of fine materials, and the deposit is extremely small. field,

linlaujiou · « **Reply #197 on:** August 07, 2019, 04:12:14 AM »

續上帖補圖….共同暗記對照
1. 一脈相承的防偽巧思與暗記佈局
2. 掌握機制真幣特徵刀鑿痕、立體感、防偽暗記、包漿漸層。
Continue to post on the map....Commonly remember
1. The same anti-counterfeit ingenuity and secret layout
2. Master the mechanism of the real currency features knife chisel marks, three-dimensional sense, anti-counterfeiting, and grouting.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #198 on:** August 07, 2019, 04:15:10 AM »

論壇首發……機制幣真假的進階常識
1.   機制真幣造幣鋼模是一比一比例手工刀鑿雕刻，不見刀鑿痕非真幣。
2.   具刀鑿痕錢幣分私版、官版兩種。
3.   私版為具造幣廠雕模技師背景所仿刻，錢文圖樣外觀或許相近，但防偽巧思、暗記佈局細節不夠周全，冷沖壓條件不足，非真幣。
4.   官版為造幣設計及雕模技師團隊分工合作，造幣條件充足，為真幣。
5.   官版真幣與私版假幣做微觀細節比對，就知兩者防偽暗記設計的豐富周全與細緻程度，存在極大的差異。
6.   初學機制幣，大都以評級入盒幣版式做為真幣參考，但隨著對掌握機制特徵實力的提升，發現私版假幣版式入盒不在少數，因此官版真幣的尋真探真是每位機制幣同好責無旁貸的使命。
Forum starter... advanced knowledge of mechanism currency true and false
1. Mechanism The real coin coin-making steel mold is a one-to-one ratio hand-knife chisel carving, no knife-cutting non-real coins.
2. There are two types of private and official versions of the knife and the chisel.
3. The private version is imitation of the background of the mint carving technician. The appearance of pattern may be similar, but the anti-counterfeiting and intricate layout details are not comprehensive enough, and the cold stamping conditions are insufficient.
4. The official version is a division of labor for the coinage design and the team of carving technicians. The coinage conditions are sufficient and they are genuine coins.
5. The official version of the real coin and the private version of the counterfeit currency to do micro-level comparison, know that the rich and comprehensive design of the anti-counterfeiting and meticulous design, there is a great difference.
6. The beginner's mechanism currency is mostly based on the rating of the box currency as a real currency reference. However, with the improvement of the characteristics of the mastery mechanism, it is found that the private version of the counterfeit currency is not in a small number. Therefore, the authenticity of the official version of the real coin is Each mechanism currency is equally responsible for the mission.

linlaujiou · « **Reply #199 on:** August 16, 2019, 09:24:31 PM »

論壇首發....機制幣考古新發現
• 1.玩藏機制幣的人都知道1894湖北銀元局造,湖北省造背本省光緒元寶七錢二分背龍圖英文字母S有斷筆與不斷筆的爭議,其實造幣防偽巧思有其延續性,當你找到1895湖北省造光緒元寶七錢二分真幣,這個爭議就不存在了.中國上海博物館藏有此幣種S斷筆與不斷筆兩種拓片,我看都是假的.
• 2.中國民初錢幣大師馬定祥曾說湖北省造背本省幣種,兩個省字形神相合,自此錢幣造假也就依葫蘆畫瓢,搞出許多以假仿假的假幣.其實機制幣防偽是以最大變數亂數為原則.也就是說相同中英文字體筆畫會刻意搞成形神總不合,依我說,錢幣大師馬定祥沒見過此幣種真幣.
• 3.湖北省造背本省幣種限湖北省內流通使用,依流通需求量前人皆說此幣種只存在唯一版式,這個說法個人認為是可信的.
• 4.1877-1878湖南省造光緒元寶七錢二分,有一種版式是以湖北省造光緒元寶樣式只是把北字改成南字,這種湖南省造版式是假的.
• 5.湖北省造光緒元寶,宣統元寶七錢二分兩幣種背龍圖中間火珠能發現旋紋設計版式.這也是防偽巧思之一.至於火珠旋紋起源於何時?及其延續歷程如何,從未見有人提及.機制幣圖文防偽巧思的延續性能幫助了解造幣演進過程無庸置疑.
• 6.依我手中錢幣實物證據顯示,1877-1878英國伯明翰造幣廠受託湖南省造光緒元寶七錢二分幣模刻製,確曾參酌1894湖北省造背本省及1895湖北省造流通版的字形及防偽巧思.
• 7.河南省造光緒元寶七錢二分背龍圖參酌湖南省造七錢二分背龍圖,只是兩者防偽設計不同,河南省造光緒元寶七錢二分造幣時程及造幣鋼模從何而來尚待有心人繼續考證.
• 8.1894湖北省造背本省與1895湖北省造流通版,兩幣種字面錢文是不同版式的.這對玩藏機制幣愛好者而言,會是個晴天霹靂.可能需要收驚.
• Forum debut.... mechanism coin archaeological discovery
     • 1. People who play the Tibetan currency know that 1894 Hubei Silver Dollar Bureau made, Hubei Province made the province Guangxu Yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS back dragon figure English letter S has broken pen and constant pen controversy, in fact, coinage anti-counterfeiting ingenuity has its continuation Sex, when you find 1895 Hubei Province made Guangxu yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS true coin, this controversy does not exist. The Shanghai Museum of China has this kind of currency S broken pen and constant pen two rubbings, I think it is fake.
     • 2. The Chinese national capital coin master Ma Dingxiang once said that Hubei Province made the province's currency, and the two provinces were in harmony with each other. Since then, the coin fraud has also been based on the gourd paintings, and many counterfeit counterfeit coins have been created. Anti-counterfeiting is based on the principle of maximum number of random numbers. That is to say, the same Chinese and English type of strokes will deliberately create a god that is always inconsistent. According to me, the coin master Ma Dingxiang has never seen this currency.
     • 3. Hubei Province's back-to-back province currency is restricted to circulation in Hubei Province. According to the circulation demand, the predecessors said that there is only a unique layout in this currency. This statement is personally believed to be credible.
• • 4.1877-1878 Hunan Province made Guangxu yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS, there is a layout is based on Hubei Province Guangxu Yuanbao style only to change the North word into a southern character, this Hunan Province is a fake version.
     • 5. Hubei Province Guangxu Yuanbao, Xuantong Yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS two-dollar back dragon figure middle fire beads can find the swirl design layout. This is also one of the anti-counterfeiting ingenuity. As for when the fireball spine originated and its continuation How the history has never been mentioned. The continuation performance of the mechanism currency anti-counterfeiting ingenuity helps to understand the evolution of the coinage process without a doubt.
     • According to the physical evidence of the coins in my hands, the Birmingham Mint in 1877-1878 was entrusted to the Hunan Province to create Guangxu Yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS. It has indeed considered the 1894 Hubei Province and the 1895 Hubei Province. And anti-counterfeiting.
     • 7. Henan Province made Guangxu yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS back dragon map to participate in Hunan Province to make seven money two points back dragon map, but the two security design is different, Henan Province Guangxu yuanbao 7 MACE AND 2 CANDAREENS coinage time and coinage steel mold from where I still have to wait for someone to continue to research.
• 8.1894 Hubei Province, the back of the province and 1895 Hubei Province, the circulation version, the two-currency literal money is different layout. This is a blue sky for the fans of the game currency. It may need to be shocked.

News:

Author Topic: 1911 China coin to see is to believe (Read 106515 times)